Ramirez v. Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Filing
12
ORDER granting 11 Motion to Amend to Name a proper Respondent and substituting S. Frauenheim as Respondent signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/19/2017. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ERIK DANIEL RAMIREZ,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
Case No. 1:17-cv-00029-LJO-JLT-HC
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND
TO NAME A PROPER RESPONDENT
[Doc. 11]
v.
S. FRAUENHEIM, Warden,
15
ORDER SUBSTITUTING S. FRAUENHEIM
AS RESPONDENT IN THIS MATTER
Respondent.
16
17
On January 9, 2017, Petitioner filed a federal petition for writ of habeas corpus. He
18 named the California Department of Corrections as Respondent in this matter. On March 15,
19 2017, the Court advised Petitioner that he had failed to name a proper respondent. Petitioner was
20 granted leave to file a motion to amend to name a proper respondent.
21
On March 15, 2017, Petitioner filed a motion to amend the petition to name S.
22 Frauenheim as Respondent in this matter. Petitioner has named the proper respondent since S.
23 Fraueheim is the warden at his institution and he has “day-to-day control over” the petitioner.
24 Brittingham v. United States, 982 F.2d 378, 379 (9th Cir. 1992).
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
1
ORDER
1
2
Accordingly, Petitioner’s motion to amend and name a proper respondent is GRANTED.
3 S. Frauenheim, Warden, is hereby SUBSTITUTED as Respondent in this matter.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
March 19, 2017
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?