Segovia v. Peters, et al.
ORDER Directing Clerk's Office to Resend ECF Nos. 14, 15, and 16 to Plaintiff at California Medical Facility; ORDER Extending Deadline to Respond to Order to Show Cause signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 03/23/2017. (Flores, E)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CASE NO. 1:17-cv-00053-MJS (PC)
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE
TO RESEND ECF NOS. 14, 15, AND 16
TO PLAINTIFF AT CALIFORNIA
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO
RESPOND TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
(ECF NO. 16)
FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil
rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff recently has failed to
respond to several court orders and an order to show cause. Although Plaintiff’s mail has
not been returned to the Court, a review of the California Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation Inmate Locator reflects that Plaintiff presently is housed at California
Medical Facility. However, his address of record with the Court remains at California
State Prison, Sacramento. Plaintiff is reminded of his obligation to inform the Court of
any changes to his address. Local Rule 183(b). Failure to submit a notice of change of
address may result in dismissal of the action.
In light of the foregoing circumstances, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s deadline to respond to the order to show cause (ECF No.16) is
extended. Plaintiff shall respond to the order to show cause within fourteen
days of the date of this order.
2. The Clerk’s Office is directed to re-send ECF Nos.14, 15, and 16 to Plaintiff
at California Medical Facility.
3. If Plaintiff is no longer housed at California State Prison, Sacramento, he
shall submit a notice of change of address as required by Local Rule
4. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of the action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
March 23, 2017
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?