Trujillo v. Luis Armando Huerta's Super Taco, Inc. et al
Filing
22
ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Close Case, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/22/17. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
JOSE TRUJILLO,
Plaintiff,
vs.
LUIS ARMANDO HUERTA’S SUPER
TACO, INC., et al.,
16
17
18
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 1:17-cv-00059-DAD-SKO
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF
COURT TO CLOSE CASE
(Doc. 21)
19
20
21
22
23
On August 20, 2017, Plaintiff filed the parties’ stipulation that this action be dismissed
with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (Doc. 21.)
In relevant part, Rule 41(a)(1)(A) provides as follows:
25
[A] plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice
of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for
summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who
have appeared.
26
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). Rule 41 thus allows the parties to dismiss an action voluntarily,
27
after service of an answer, by filing a written stipulation to dismiss signed by all of the parties
24
28
1
who have appeared, although an oral stipulation in open court will also suffice. See Eitel v.
2
McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1472-73 (9th Cir. 1986).
3
Once the stipulation between the parties who have appeared is properly filed or made in
4
open court, no order of the court is necessary to effectuate dismissal. Case law concerning
5
stipulated dismissals under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) is clear that the entry of such a stipulation of
6
dismissal is effective automatically and does not require judicial approval. Commercial Space
7
Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999). Because the parties have filed
8
a stipulation for dismissal of this case with prejudice under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) that is signed
9
by all parties who have made an appearance, this case has terminated. Fed. R. Civ. P.
10
41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
11
Accordingly IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court close this case.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
September 22, 2017
/s/
Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?