Lear v. Manasrah

Filing 26

ORDER adopting 22 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying 18 Motion for Injunctive Relief signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/14/2017. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RODERICK WILLIAM LEAR,

12
13
14
15

No. 1:17-cv-00071-DAD-MJS

Plaintiff,
v.
A. MANASRAH et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING
MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
(Doc. Nos. 18, 22)

16
17
18

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

19

action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

20

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302 of the United States

21

District Court for the Eastern District of California.

22

On May 22, 2017, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations

23

recommending that plaintiff’s request for injunctive relief be denied. (Doc. No. 22.) Plaintiff’s

24

objections were due within fourteen days of the date of service of those findings and

25

recommendations. Plaintiff has not filed objections to those findings and recommendations and

26

the deadline for doing so has passed.

27
28

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the court has conducted a
de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings
1

1

and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

2

Accordingly,

3

1. The May 22, 2017 findings and recommendations (Doc. No. 22) are adopted in full;

4
5
6
7

and
2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (Doc. No. 18) is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

August 14, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2