Trujillo v. Fairou American, Inc. et al

Filing 32

ORDER on Second Request for Extension of Time Within Which to File Dispositional Documents. The time within which dispositional documents must be filed is extended to November 10, 2017. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/30/2017. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Zachary M. Best, SBN 166035 MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C. 332 North Second Street San Jose, California 95112 Telephone (408) 298-2000 Facsimile (408) 298-6046 E-mail: service@mission.legal Attorney for Plaintiff, Jose Trujillo 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 JOSE TRUJILLO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) vs. ) FAIROU AMERICAN, INC. dba IVANHOE ) ) SPEEDY MART, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:17-cv-00077-AWI-SKO SECOND REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE DISPOSITIONAL DOCUMENTS; ORDER 19 20 WHEREAS, Plaintiff Jose Trujillo (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants, Fairou American, Inc. 21 dba Ivanhoe Speedy Mart, Rami Khazal, Manila Khazal, and Nadia Aroush (“Defendants”) 22 reached an agreement to settle the matter at a Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge 23 Grosjean on September 19, 2017 (Dkt. 27); 24 25 WHEREAS, the parties were directed to file the appropriate dismissal documents within thirty days of September 19, 2017 (Dkt. 27); 26 WHEREAS, as a condition precedent to filing a stipulation for dismissal of entire 27 action with prejudice pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement, the settlement payment 28 was to be received by Plaintiff from Defendants on October 4, 2017; however, such settlement SECOND REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE DISPOSITIONAL DOCUMENTS; ORDER Page 1 1 payment has still not yet been received despite repeated reminders from Plaintiff’s counsel, and 2 Plaintiff has yet to receive a signed settlement agreement from Defendants; 3 4 WHEREAS, counsel for Defendants acknowledged that the fully executed settlement agreement along with the settlement payment was mailed on October 25, 2017; 5 6 WHEREAS, Plaintiff requested, and the Court ordered, that the Parties have until October 27, 2017 (Dkt. 29) to file dispositional documents; 7 8 NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff hereby respectfully requests that the time within which dispositional documents must be filed be further extended to November 10, 2017. 9 10 Dated: October 26, 2017 MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C. 11 /s/ Zachary M. Best Zachary M. Best Attorney for Plaintiff, Jose Trujillo 12 13 14 15 ORDER 16 Upon request of Plaintiff (Doc. 31) and good cause appearing. 17 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time within which dispositional documents must 18 be filed be extended to November 10, 2017. 19 20 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 30, 2017 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECOND REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE DISPOSITIONAL DOCUMENTS; ORDER Page 2 .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?