Bryant v. The Habit Restaurants, LLC et al

Filing 13

STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the parties' request for an extension of time to 4/25/2017 for receipt of defendant Fresno 40 Limited Partnership, LP's responsive pleading. The Court further continues the Initial Scheduling Conference curre ntly set for 4/25/2017 to 5/10/2017 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. The Court grants telephonic appearances, with each party wishing to so appear directed to use the following dial-in number and passcode : 1-888-251-2909; passcode 1024453. The parties are also reminded to file a joint status report one full week prior to the conference and email a copy of same, in Word format, to epgorders@caed.uscourts.gov, for the Judge's review. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 4/18/2017. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Zachary M. Best, SBN 166035 MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C. 332 North Second Street San Jose, California 95112 Telephone (408) 298-2000 Facsimile (408) 298-6046 Email: service@mission.legal Attorneys for Plaintiff Rachel Bryant 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 RACHEL BRYANT, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 vs. THE HABIT RESTAURANTS, LLC dba THE HABIT BURGER GRILL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:17-cv-00099-AWI-EPG STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND FOR FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT FRESNO 40 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, LP TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER 18 19 WHEREAS, a Mandatory Scheduling Conference in this action is currently set for April 20 25, 2017, pursuant to the Court’s Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference dated 21 January 23, 2017 (Dkt. 3); 22 WHEREAS, Plaintiff, Rachel Bryant (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant, and Fresno 40 23 Limited Partnership, LP (“Fresno 40”), previously stipulated to an extension of time for Fresno 24 40’s responsive pleading such that the responsive pleading was due on April 11, 2017 (Dkt. 10 25 and 11); 26 WHEREAS, counsel for Fresno 40 is presently on vacation and is unable to file the 27 responsive pleading, and is unavailable to participate in the preparation of the joint scheduling 28 report which is due on April 18, 2017; STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 1 1 NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Fresno 40, together with Defendant The Habit 2 Restaurants, LLC dba The Habit Burger Grill (collectively “the Parties”), by and through their 3 respective counsel, stipulate to a continuance of the Mandatory Scheduling Conference 4 currently set for April 25, 2017 to a date at the Court’s convenience on or after May 9, 2017. 5 The Parties additionally stipulate to a further extension of time for Fresno 40’s responsive 6 pleading such that it is now due on or before April 25, 2017. 7 8 Dated: April 13, 2017 MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C. /s/ Zachary M. Best Zachary M. Best Attorneys for Plaintiff, Rachel Bryant 9 10 11 12 Date: April 13, 2017 LAW OFFICES OF NICK ZINKIN 13 /s/ Nick Zinkin Nick Zinkin Attorneys for Defendant, Fresno 40 Limited Partnership, LP 14 15 16 17 Date: April 18, 2017 FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP 18 /s/ Alexa Greenbaum Alexa Greenbaum Alden J. Parker Attorneys for Defendant, The Habit Restaurants, LLC dba The Habit Burger Grill 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 2 ORDER 1 2 The parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing, 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for 4 April 25, 2017 is continued to May 10, 2017 at 9:30 am, before Magistrate Judge Erica P. 5 Grosjean. The parties are to file their Joint Scheduling Report no later than seven days prior to 6 the conference. Defendant Fresno 40 Limited Partnership, LP shall file its responsive pleading 7 by April 25, 2017. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Dated: 11 April 18, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?