Bryant v. The Habit Restaurants, LLC et al
Filing
13
STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the parties' request for an extension of time to 4/25/2017 for receipt of defendant Fresno 40 Limited Partnership, LP's responsive pleading. The Court further continues the Initial Scheduling Conference curre ntly set for 4/25/2017 to 5/10/2017 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. The Court grants telephonic appearances, with each party wishing to so appear directed to use the following dial-in number and passcode : 1-888-251-2909; passcode 1024453. The parties are also reminded to file a joint status report one full week prior to the conference and email a copy of same, in Word format, to epgorders@caed.uscourts.gov, for the Judge's review. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 4/18/2017. (Rooney, M)
1
2
3
4
5
Zachary M. Best, SBN 166035
MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
Email: service@mission.legal
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Rachel Bryant
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
RACHEL BRYANT,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
vs.
THE HABIT RESTAURANTS, LLC dba
THE HABIT BURGER GRILL, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 1:17-cv-00099-AWI-EPG
STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF
MANDATORY SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE AND FOR FURTHER
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEFENDANT FRESNO 40 LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP, LP TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT; ORDER
18
19
WHEREAS, a Mandatory Scheduling Conference in this action is currently set for April
20
25, 2017, pursuant to the Court’s Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference dated
21
January 23, 2017 (Dkt. 3);
22
WHEREAS, Plaintiff, Rachel Bryant (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant, and Fresno 40
23
Limited Partnership, LP (“Fresno 40”), previously stipulated to an extension of time for Fresno
24
40’s responsive pleading such that the responsive pleading was due on April 11, 2017 (Dkt. 10
25
and 11);
26
WHEREAS, counsel for Fresno 40 is presently on vacation and is unable to file the
27
responsive pleading, and is unavailable to participate in the preparation of the joint scheduling
28
report which is due on April 18, 2017;
STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 1
1
NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Fresno 40, together with Defendant The Habit
2
Restaurants, LLC dba The Habit Burger Grill (collectively “the Parties”), by and through their
3
respective counsel, stipulate to a continuance of the Mandatory Scheduling Conference
4
currently set for April 25, 2017 to a date at the Court’s convenience on or after May 9, 2017.
5
The Parties additionally stipulate to a further extension of time for Fresno 40’s responsive
6
pleading such that it is now due on or before April 25, 2017.
7
8
Dated: April 13, 2017
MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.
/s/ Zachary M. Best
Zachary M. Best
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
Rachel Bryant
9
10
11
12
Date: April 13, 2017
LAW OFFICES OF NICK ZINKIN
13
/s/ Nick Zinkin
Nick Zinkin
Attorneys for Defendant,
Fresno 40 Limited Partnership, LP
14
15
16
17
Date: April 18, 2017
FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP
18
/s/ Alexa Greenbaum
Alexa Greenbaum
Alden J. Parker
Attorneys for Defendant,
The Habit Restaurants, LLC
dba The Habit Burger Grill
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 2
ORDER
1
2
The parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for
4
April 25, 2017 is continued to May 10, 2017 at 9:30 am, before Magistrate Judge Erica P.
5
Grosjean. The parties are to file their Joint Scheduling Report no later than seven days prior to
6
the conference. Defendant Fresno 40 Limited Partnership, LP shall file its responsive pleading
7
by April 25, 2017.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
Dated:
11
April 18, 2017
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?