Jacobsen v. Maldinado

Filing 12

ORDER Directing the Clerk's Office to Re-Serve 10 Order on Plaintiff, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/24/17. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL JACOBSEN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. Case No. 1:17-cv-00101-BAM (PC) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE TO RE-SERVE JULY 14, 2017 ORDER ON PLAINTIFF MALDINADO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Michael Jacobsen (“Plaintiff”) is a former pretrial detainee proceeding pro se and 17 18 in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 10, 2017, 19 Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address and request for status of case. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff 20 stated that he was incarcerated and did not know which of his cases had deadlines. The Court 21 issued an order granting Plaintiff’s request for status of case on July 14, 2017, which was directed 22 by the Clerk of the Court to Plaintiff’s address of record at the time, P.O. Box 872, Fresno, 23 California, 93712. (ECF No. 10.) On July 19, 2017, Plaintiff filed a new change of address in Jacobsen v. People of the 24 25 State of Cal., No. 1:14-cv-00108-JLT.1 (No. 1:14-cv-00108-JLT, Docket No. 122; see ECF No. 26 11.) Plaintiff updates his mailing address and states that he has been released from jail, but has 27 not received the Court’s response to his first request for status. (Id.) 28 1 The Court takes judicial notice of the files in that case. Fed. R. Evid. 201. 1 1 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to re- 2 serve the Court’s July 14, 2017 Order Granting Request for Status of Case on Plaintiff at his 3 current address of record. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara July 24, 2017 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?