Jones v. Meddly
ORDER Striking Plaintiff's 19 Reply to Defendant's Answer to Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/11/17. (Gonzalez, R)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ARTHUR R. JONES,
Case No. 1:17-cv-00109-SAB (PC)
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S REPLY
TO DEFENDANT’S ANSWER TO
(ECF No. 19)
Plaintiff Arthur R. Jones is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights
13 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On August 29, 2017, Plaintiff filed a reply to Defendant’s answer to the complaint,
15 stating that he objects to the defenses raised as false and without merit. (ECF No. 19.)
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7 lists all pleadings that are permitted, including “if the
17 court orders one, a reply to an answer.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a)(7) (emphasis added). No request to
18 file a reply to the answer was sought in this case, and the Court declines to require it.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s reply to Defendant’s answer to the complaint is HEREBY
20 STRICKEN from the record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
October 11, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?