Bryant v. Cafe Rio, Inc. et al

Filing 21

ORDER Directing the Clerk of Court to Close the Case signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 07/24/2017. CASE CLOSED.(Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 RACHEL BRYANT, 10 11 12 13 Plaintiff Case No. 1:17-cv-00125-LJO-EPG ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE v. (ECF No. 20) CAFE RIO, INC.; RIVER PARK PROPERTIES III, Defendants. 14 15 On July 20, 2017, Plaintiff Rachel Bryant filed a notice of dismissal dismissing his case 16 with prejudice. (ECF No. 20.) No defendant has filed an answer or motion for summary 17 judgment. In light of Plaintiff’s notice, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 18 41(a)(1)(A)(i); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been 19 dismissed with prejudice. Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“Even if the 20 defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his action voluntarily by filing 21 a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1).”). 22 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case. 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 24, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?