Clayton v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

Filing 10

ORDER Closing Case, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/5/17. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LAURENCE CLAYTON, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, Defendant. 15 16 17 ) Case No.: 1:17-cv-0154 LJO JLT ) ) ORDER CLOSING CASE ) ) (Doc. 9) ) ) ) ) ) The parties have filed as stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice, with each party to bear 18 their own attorney fees and costs. (Doc. 9) The stipulation relies on Fed. R. Civ.P. 41(a)(1) which 19 provides, “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: . . . a stipulation of 20 dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.”. . .” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Once such a notice has 21 been filed, an order of the Court is not required to make the dismissal effective. Fed. R. Civ. P. 22 41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Thus, the Clerk of Court is 23 DIRECTED to close this action in light of the stipulation signed pursuant to Rule 41(a). 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 5, 2017 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?