Commercial Credit Group Inc. v. Engineered Well Service International, Inc.
Filing
7
ORDER Directing Clerk of the Court to Close the Case signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/21/2017. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
COMMERCIAL CREDIT GROUP INC., a
Delaware corporation,
Plaintiff,
13
16
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE
COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE
v.
14
15
No. 1:17-cv-000156-DAD-JLT
ENGINEERED WELL SERVICE
INTERNATIONAL, INC., a California
corporation,
(Doc. No. 6)
Defendants.
17
18
On February 15, 2017, plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice of
19
20
this action pursuant to Federal Rule Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). (Doc. No. 6.) Under Rule
21
41(a), a plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order if he or she files “a notice or
22
dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or motion for summary judgment” or
23
a “stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P.
24
41(a)(1)(A)(i)-(ii). Here, defendant, Engineered Well Service International, Inc., has not filed an
25
answer or a motion for summary judgment. In light of the voluntary dismissal, this action has
26
terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th
27
Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed without prejudice.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, the court directs the Clerk of Court to close this case. Plaintiff’s pending
2
motion for writ of possession, private place order or turnover order (Doc. No. 4) is dismissed as
3
having been rendered moot by this order. All court dates and deadlines previously set in this
4
matter are hereby vacated.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated:
February 21, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?