Carballar et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
Filing
7
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-86). CASE TRANSFERRED to the Northern District of California. MDL No. 2672. (Robles, S)
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 2976 Filed 02/27/17 Page 13 3
Case MDL No. 2672 Document 2274 Filed 02/27/17 Page 1 of of
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
IN RE: VOLKSWAGEN "CLEAN DIESEL"
MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND
PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
MDL No. 2672
(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −86)
On December 8, 2015, the Panel transferred 56 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for
the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 148 F.Supp.3d 1367 (J.P.M.L. 2015). Since that time, 1,201 additional
action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of California. With the consent of that court,
all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Charles R. Breyer.
It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are
common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to
Judge Breyer.
Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the
Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of December 8, 2015, and, with the
consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Charles R. Breyer.
This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States
District Court for the Northern District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall
be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the
Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.
Feb 27, 2017
FOR THE PANEL:
Jeffery N. Lüthi
Clerk of the Panel
I hereby certify that the annexed
instrument is a true and correct copy
of the original on file in my office.
ATTEST:
SUSAN Y. SOONG
Clerk, U.S. District Court
Northern District of California
by:
Date:
Deputy Clerk
27 February 2017
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 2976 Filed 02/27/17 Page 23 3
Case MDL No. 2672 Document 2274 Filed 02/27/17 Page 2 of of
IN RE: VOLKSWAGEN "CLEAN DIESEL"
MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND
PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
MDL No. 2672
SCHEDULE CTO−86 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS
DIST
DIV.
C.A.NO.
CASE CAPTION
CALIFORNIA CENTRAL
CAC
2
17−01071
CAC
2
17−01115
CAC
2
17−01119
CAC
2
17−01120
CAC
2
17−01180
CAC
5
17−00250
CAC
8
17−00274
Todd B. Cookston v. Volkswagen Group of
America,Inc., et al
Hanafi R. Fraval et al v. Volkswagen Group of America,
Inc. et al
Matthew Redman v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc
et al
Phyllis Reffo v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc et
al
Peter Luis Morejon v. Volkswagen Group of America,
Inc et al
Brandon S. Crocker v. Volkswagen Group of America,
Inc et al
Yvonne Morrison et al v. Volkswagen Group of
America, Inc. et al
CALIFORNIA EASTERN
CAE
1
17−00174
CAE
1
17−00176
CAE
1
17−00177
CAE
1
17−00198
Carballar et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et
al
Wagner v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
Waymire, et al. v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
et al.
Cooper, et al. v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN
CAS
CAS
CAS
CAS
CAS
3
3
3
3
3
FLORIDA MIDDLE
17−00276
17−00277
17−00278
17−00279
17−00293
Bodden v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
Imhoff v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
Reoh II v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
Reyes v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
Pallares v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 2976 Filed 02/27/17 Page 33 3
Case MDL No. 2672 Document 2274 Filed 02/27/17 Page 3 of of
FLM
8
17−00314
Brooks et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
Opposed 2/23/17
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?