Ros v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
16
ORDER on Stipulation for Dismissal, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/25/17. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Brian C. Shapiro
Attorney at Law: 192789
Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing
12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115
Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
Tel.: (562) 868-5886
Fax: (562) 868-5491
E-mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Vuthy Ros
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FRESNO DIVISION
8
9
10
11
VUTHY ROS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
vs.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
16
Defendant.
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:17-cv-00178-JLT
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL;
ORDER THEREON
(Doc. 15)
18
TO THE HONORABLE JENNIFER L. THURSTON, MAGISTRATE
19
20
JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Vuthy Ros (“Plaintiff”) and
21
22
Nancy A. Berryhill as the Acting Commissioner of Social Security
23
24
///
25
26
27
28
///
-1-
1
2
(“Defendant”), that this matter be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its
3
own fees, costs, and expenses. The parties enter into this stipulation pursuant to
4
the terms of F.R.Civ.P. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(a)(1)(B), requiring no separate
5
order of the Court.
6
DATE: August 22, 2017 Respectfully submitted,
7
LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING
8
/s/ Brian C. Shapiro
BY: __________________
Brian C. Shapiro
Attorney for plaintiff Vuthy Ros
9
10
11
DATE: August 22, 2017
12
13
14
PHILIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
/s/ Cynthia B. De Nardi
15
CYNTHIA B. DE NARDI
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
(Per e-mail authorization)
16
17
18
ORDER
19
20
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
August 25, 2017
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?