Yarbrough v. Marin et al

Filing 17

ORDER REGARDING Plaintiff's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss This Action, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/20/18. CASE CLOSED.(Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EDDIE YARBROUGH, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. PRISCILLA MARIN, et al., 15 Case No. 1:17-cv-00185-AWI-BAM (PC) ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS THIS ACTION (ECF No. 16) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Eddie Yarbrough (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 17 18 pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on 19 February 10, 2017. On February 16, 2018, Plaintiff filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss this 20 action, without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). (ECF No. 21 16.) 22 “[U]nder Rule 41(a)(1)(i), a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action 23 prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Commercial 24 Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999) (quotation and 25 citation omitted). “[A] dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is effective on filing, no court order is 26 required, the parties are left as though no action had been brought, the defendant can’t complain, 27 and the district court lacks jurisdiction to do anything about it.” Id. at 1078. No defendant has 28 been served in this action and no defendant has filed an answer or motion for summary 1 1 2 judgment. Accordingly, this action is terminated by operation of law without further order from the 3 Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate all pending 4 motions and deadlines, and close this case. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara February 20, 2018 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?