United States of America v. Ford
Filing
7
ORDER relating and reassigning cases signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/17/2017. The New Case Number is 1:17-cv-00187-DAD-EPG. The Related Case Number is 1:17-cv-00034-DAD-EPG.(Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MELBA FORD,
12
13
14
No. 1:17-cv-00034-DAD-EPG
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER RELATING AND REASSIGNING
CASES
CAROLINE CIRAOLO-KLEPPER et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
No. 1:17-cv-00187-LJO-MJS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
18
19
20
21
New Case Number:
1:17-cr-00187-DAD-EPG
v.
MELBA FORD,
Defendant.
22
23
Review of the above-captioned action entitled United States of America v. Melba Ford,
24
No. 1:17-cv-00187-LJO-MJS (“Ford II”), reveals it is related under this court’s Local Rule 123 to
25
the following action pending before the undersigned: Melba Ford v. Caroline Ciraolo-Klepper et
26
al., No. 1:17-cv-00034-DAD-EPG. These actions involve the same or similar parties, properties,
27
claims, events, and/or questions of fact or law. In addition, the currently assigned district and
28
magistrate judges in the Ford II action have not engaged in that matter in any substantial way.
1
1
Accordingly, assignment of the actions to the undersigned and to Magistrate Judge Erica P.
2
Grosjean will promote efficiency and economy for the court and parties.
3
An order relating cases under this court’s Local Rule 123 merely assigns them to the same
4
district judge and magistrate judge, and does not consolidate the cases. Good cause appearing,
5
the court orders that the Ford II action is reassigned to U.S. District Judge Dale A. Drozd and
6
U.S. Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. All documents filed in that action shall bear the new
7
case number:
8
9
10
1:17-cv-00187-DAD-EPG
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
March 17, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?