Johnson v. Sanofi S.A., et al.

Filing 7

STIPULATION and ORDER Extending Time for Defendant Mckesson Corporation to Respond to the Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/23/2017. (Valdez, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 ERIN M. BOSMAN (BAR NO. 204987) EBosman@mofo.com JULIE Y. PARK (BAR NO. 259929) JuliePark@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 12531 High Bluff Drive San Diego, California 92130-2040 Telephone: 858.720.5100 Facsimile: 858.720.5125 Attorneys for Defendant MCKESSON CORPORATION 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRESNO DIVISION 11 JUDY JOHNSON, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 1:17-cv-00196-DAD-SAB Plaintiff, v. SANOFI S.A., AVENTIS PHARMA S.A., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, and MCKESSON CORPORATION, Defendants. STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT MCKESSON CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT 1 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 144, Plaintiff Judy Johnson and Defendant McKesson 2 Corporation, through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate, subject to the Court’s approval, 3 as follows: WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this case in the Superior Court of California, 4 5 Fresno County, on November 17, 2016; 6 WHEREAS, McKesson was served with the Complaint on November 21, 2016; 7 WHEREAS, Defendant Sanofi Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC removed this action to this Court 8 on February 10, 2017; WHEREAS, McKesson’s deadline to respond to the Complaint, pursuant to Federal Rule 9 10 of Civil Procedure 6 and 81(c), is February 17, 2017; 11 WHEREAS, Plaintiff intends to file a Motion to Remand this action to state court; 12 WHEREAS, Plaintiff and McKesson agree that extending McKesson’s deadline until the 13 jurisdictional issue is resolved will conserve the parties’ and judicial resources; WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), parties may agree to an extension of time, 14 15 provided the stipulation is approved by the Court if the extension of time is greater than 28 days; 16 WHEREAS, the extension proposed herein will not alter the date of any event or deadline 17 already fixed by Court order; and WHEREAS, no previous extensions of time have been obtained with respect to this 18 19 20 matter. NOW, THEREFORE, in the interest of judicial economy and good cause showing, the 21 parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby agree and stipulate, and the 22 Court hereby orders, as follows: 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 1 2 McKesson shall have until 14 days after the Court issues an order on Plaintiff’s forthcoming Motion to Remand to respond to the Complaint. 3 4 Dated: February 23, 2017 5 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: /s/ Erin M. Bosman Erin M. Bosman 6 Attorneys for Defendant MCKESSON CORPORATION 7 8 9 10 Dated: February 23, 2017 GIBBS LAW GROUP By: 11 /s/ Karen Barth Menzies Karen Barth Menzies Attorneys for Plaintiff JUDY JOHNSON 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 ECF ATTESTATION 2 I, Erin M. Bosman, am the ECF User whose ID and Password are being used to file this 3 4 document. I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the 5 signatory. 6 Dated: February 23, 2017 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 7 8 By: /s/ Erin M. Bosman Erin M. Bosman 9 10 11 12 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 23, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?