Johnson v. Sanofi S.A., et al.

Filing 7

STIPULATION and ORDER Extending Time for Defendant Mckesson Corporation to Respond to the Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/23/2017. (Valdez, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6

ERIN M. BOSMAN (BAR NO. 204987)
[e-mail]
JULIE Y. PARK (BAR NO. 259929)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
12531 High Bluff Drive
San Diego, California 92130-2040
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 858.720.5125
Attorneys for Defendant
MCKESSON CORPORATION

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

FRESNO DIVISION

11

JUDY JOHNSON,

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Case No. 1:17-cv-00196-DAD-SAB
Plaintiff,

v.
SANOFI S.A., AVENTIS PHARMA S.A.,
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, and
MCKESSON CORPORATION,
Defendants.

STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING TIME FOR
DEFENDANT MCKESSON
CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO
THE COMPLAINT

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 144, Plaintiff Judy Johnson and Defendant McKesson

2

Corporation, through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate, subject to the Court’s approval,

3

as follows:
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this case in the Superior Court of California,

4
5

Fresno County, on November 17, 2016;

6

WHEREAS, McKesson was served with the Complaint on November 21, 2016;

7

WHEREAS, Defendant Sanofi Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC removed this action to this Court

8

on February 10, 2017;
WHEREAS, McKesson’s deadline to respond to the Complaint, pursuant to Federal Rule

9
10

of Civil Procedure 6 and 81(c), is February 17, 2017;

11

WHEREAS, Plaintiff intends to file a Motion to Remand this action to state court;

12

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and McKesson agree that extending McKesson’s deadline until the

13

jurisdictional issue is resolved will conserve the parties’ and judicial resources;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), parties may agree to an extension of time,

14
15

provided the stipulation is approved by the Court if the extension of time is greater than 28 days;

16

WHEREAS, the extension proposed herein will not alter the date of any event or deadline

17

already fixed by Court order; and
WHEREAS, no previous extensions of time have been obtained with respect to this

18
19
20

matter.
NOW, THEREFORE, in the interest of judicial economy and good cause showing, the

21

parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby agree and stipulate, and the

22

Court hereby orders, as follows:

23
24
25
26
27
28

1

1
2

McKesson shall have until 14 days after the Court issues an order on Plaintiff’s
forthcoming Motion to Remand to respond to the Complaint.

3
4

Dated: February 23, 2017

5

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
By: /s/ Erin M. Bosman
Erin M. Bosman

6

Attorneys for Defendant
MCKESSON CORPORATION

7

8
9
10

Dated: February 23, 2017

GIBBS LAW GROUP
By:

11

/s/ Karen Barth Menzies
Karen Barth Menzies
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JUDY JOHNSON

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

1
ECF ATTESTATION

2

I, Erin M. Bosman, am the ECF User whose ID and Password are being used to file this

3
4

document. I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the

5

signatory.

6
Dated: February 23, 2017

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

7

8
By:

/s/ Erin M. Bosman
Erin M. Bosman

9
10
11
12
13
14

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

February 23, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3