Rodriguez v. Penner et al

Filing 4

ORDER STRIKING Plaintiff's 3 Reply from the Record signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/7/2017. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT J. RODRIGUEZ, ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S REPLY FROM THE RECORD Plaintiff, 12 13 Case No. 1:17-cv-00204-DAD-SAB v. (ECF No. 3) 14 15 DON PENNER, et al., Defendants. 16 17 On February 13, 2017, Plaintiff Robert J. Rodriguez filed a complaint in this action, but 18 did not pay the filing fee or file an application to proceed without prepayment of fees. On 19 February 15, 2017, an order issued providing Plaintiff with thirty days in which to file an 20 application to proceed without prepayment of fees or pay the filing fee. On March 3, 2017, 21 Plaintiff filed a “reply” to the order in which he returned the order “for its value for discharge 22 and settlement of the accounting.” Plaintiff’s reply, filed March 3, 2017 shall be stricken from 23 the record as it is not responsive to the February 15, 2017 order. 24 Plaintiff’s filing also contains archaic legal verbiage, commonly associated with the 25 common law pleading practice that serves no purpose in modern pleading practice. Plaintiff is 26 advised that common law pleading and procedural practice has long been abolished by the 27 adoption of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in 1937, and it is no longer necessary to recite 28 archaic and complex legal terms in pleadings filed with the Court. See 5 Charles Alan Wright & 1 1 Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1181 (3d ed. 2012) (discussing modern 2 “simple and elastic pleading and motion procedure ... placing a minimum emphasis on form” and 3 the abolishment of “ancient procedural dogma”). Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s reply, filed March 3, 4 5 2017, is STRICKEN FROM THE RECORD. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: March 7, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?