Arvizu, et al. v. Hugler, et al.

Filing 23

STIPULATION and ORDER to Extend Time for Response to Amended Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 6/19/2017. The Court finds good cause to extend by fourteen (14) days the time for defendants' response to the amended Complaint, to June 29, 2017. (Valdez, E)

1 PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
2 BENJAMIN E. HALL
Assistant United States Attorney
3 2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401
Fresno, CA 93721
4 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
5
6 Attorneys for Defendants
7
8
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
ILEANA S. ARVIZU, an individual; and I.SA.
13 CONTRACTING SERVICES, INC., a
California corporation,
14
Plaintiffs,
15
v.
16
EDWARD C. HUGLER Acting Secretary of
17 Labor, United States Department of Labor;
SUSAN SELETSKY, an individual; and
18 RUBEN ROSALEZ, an individual,
19

Case No. 1:17-cv-00219-LJO-EPG
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME FOR RESPONSE TO
AMENDED COMPLAINT

Defendants.

20
21

Pursuant to the parties’ prior stipulation, on May 2, 2017, the Court ordered that plaintiffs file

22 their amended Complaint no later than May 15, 2017, and that defendants file a response to the
23 amended Complaint no later than June 15, 2017. See Order at ECF No. 19, p. 2. Plaintiffs filed their
24 amended Complaint (ECF No. 20) on May 15, 2017. The amended Complaint asserts an individual25 capacity claim for damages against a new defendant, Susan Seletsky. In order to allow time for the
26 Department of Justice (“DOJ”) in Washington, D.C., to process Ms. Seletsky’s request for DOJ
27 representation in this matter, the parties request that the Court extend by fourteen (14) days the time
28 for defendants’ response to the amended Complaint, to June 29, 2017.
1
30

Respectfully submitted,

1
2 Dated: June 14, 2017

PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney

3
/ /s/ Benjamin E. Hall
BENJAMIN E. HALL
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorney for Defendants

4
5
6 Dated: June 14, 2017

RAIMONDO & ASSOCIATES,
A Law Corporation

7
[Authorized June 14, 2017]
8
/ /s/ Anthony Raimondo
ANTHONY RAIMONDO
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
30

ORDER

1
2

For the reasons provided in the parties’ stipulation, the Court finds good cause to extend by

3 fourteen (14) days the time for defendants’ response to the amended Complaint, to June 29, 2017.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7

Dated:

June 19, 2017

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
30