Carter v. Voong, et al.
Filing
28
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 27 Motion for a Settlement Status Update, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/5/17. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DOMINIC CARTER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
Case No. 1:17-cv-00245-DAD-EPG (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR A SETTLEMENT STATUS UPDATE
(ECF NO. 27)
14
H. FLORES, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
On June 13, 2017, a settlement conference was held, and the case settled. (ECF No. 20).
19
20
On August 31, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion for a settlement status update. (ECF No. 27).
21
Plaintiff's motion will be denied. If Plaintiff wants an update regarding the status of the
22
settlement payment, he should contact Defendants' counsel. However, the Court notes that, based
23
on the terms stated on the record, Defendants have 180 days from the date Plaintiff delivered the
24
necessary settlement documents to Defendants to make the settlement payment.
If Defendants fail to pay the settlement amount due within that time period, Plaintiff may
25
26
bring that failure to the Court’s attention at that time.
27
\\\
28
\\\
1
1
2
Accordingly, based on the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for a
settlement status update is DENIED.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated:
September 5, 2017
/s/
6
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?