H.W.J. Designs for Agribusiness, Inc. et al v. Rethceif Enterprises, LLC et al

Filing 183

ORDER DISMISSING CASE pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/16/2020. CASE CLOSED(Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9

H.W.J. DESIGNS FOR AGRIBUSINESS,
INC., et al.
Plaintiffs,

10

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF
COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE

v.

11
12

No. 1:17-cv-00272-AWI-SKO

RETHCEIF ENTERPRISES, LLC., et al.,

(Doc. 182)

Defendants.

13
14
15

On November 13, 2010, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with
16

prejudice.1 (Doc. 182.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see

17
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and
18
has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
19
20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
Dated:
22

November 16, 2020

/s/

Sheila K. Oberto

.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

23
24
25
26
27
28

1

The parties also requested that the Court “retain jurisdiction of this action for the purpose of resolving any
controversy arising under” their confidential settlement agreement. (See Doc. 182 at 1.) The Court in its discretion
declines the parties’ request. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994);
Camacho v. City of San Luis, 359 F. App’x 794, 798 (9th Cir. 2009); California Sportfishing Prot. All. v. Agric.
Mgmt. & Prod. Co., Inc., No. 2:14-cv-02328-KJM-AC, 2016 WL 4796841, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 14, 2016) (noting
that “the court in its discretion typically declines to maintain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties’
settlement agreement.”).