Sream, Inc. v. Nagi et al

Filing 12

ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Close Case and Adjust Docket to Reflect Voluntary Dismissal signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/12/2017. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SREAM, INC., Case No. 1:17-cv-00299-LJO-SAB Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL NASSIM NAGI, 15 (ECF No. 11) Defendant. 16 17 This action was filed on March 2, 2017. (ECF No. 1.) On July 11, 2017, Plaintiff filed a 18 notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 19 “[U]nder Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), ‘a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his 20 action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment.’ ” 21 Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999) 22 (quoting Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997)). The Ninth Circuit has 23 held that Rule 41(a) allows a plaintiff to dismiss without a court order any defendant who has yet 24 to serve an answer or motion for summary judgment. Pedrina v. Chun, 987 F.2d 608, 609 (9th 25 Cir. 1993). “[A] dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is effective on filing, no court order is required, 26 the parties are left as though no action had been brought, the defendant can’t complain, and the 27 district court lacks jurisdiction to do anything about it.” Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc., 193 28 F.3d at 1078. In this action, no defendant has filed an answer or other responsive pleading. 1 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 1 2 case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: July 12, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?