Bracken v. Duran, et al.,
Filing
17
ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to File Statement Regarding Dismissal, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/19/16. 14-Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JUSTIN BRACKEN,
Plaintiff,
12
13
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
STATEMENT REGARDING DISMISSAL
v.
14
Case No. 1:17-cv-00306-AWI-JLT (PC)
DURAN, et al.,
(Doc. 16)
14-DAY DEADLINE
Defendants.
15
16
17
On June 20, 2017, the Court screened the Complaint and dismissed it with leave to amend
18
to allow the plaintiff to cure the deficiencies noted. Alternatively, the plaintiff could file a notice
19
of voluntary dismissal. (Doc. 15.) In response, Plaintiff filed a notice that he is “not ready to go
20
through with” this action until he goes “home and find (sic) me a lawyer (sic) will represent me.
21
Bye thank you and God bless.” (Doc. 16.) It appears that Plaintiff intends to voluntarily dismiss
22
this action, but this is not certain as his filing neither included the case caption, nor the case
23
number, nor indicated that it was a voluntary dismissal. Voluntary dismissal of an action under
24
Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is without prejudice, but the Court requires
25
confirmation from Plaintiff that he wishes to voluntarily dismiss this action before it will close the
26
case.
27
28
Accordingly, within 14 days of the date of service of this order, the plaintiff SHALL file
a statement indicating whether he wishes to voluntarily dismiss this action. He SHALL include
1
1
the case name and number on the notice. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, the Court
2
will assume that his most recent filing (Doc. 16) is a request for voluntary dismissal without
3
prejudice under Rule 41 and it will close the action.
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
July 19, 2017
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?