Trujillo v. Mohammed et al

Filing 12

SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR ALL DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 5/30/2017. (Kusamura, W)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Bruce A. Neilson #096952 7108 N. Fresno St. #410 Fresno, California 93720 Telephone (559) 432-9831 Facsimile (559) 432-1837 Attorney for Defendant Wadhah Ahmed Omar Mohammed and Carmela Abbattista 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ***** )))))) ) CASE NO. 1:17-cv-313-DAD-MJS JOSE TRUJILLO, ) ) SECOND STIPULATION AND XXXXXXXX Plaintiff, ) PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION ) OF TIME FOR ALL DEFENDANTS TO vs. ) RESPOND TO COMPLAINT ) WADHAH AHMED OMAR MOHAMMED ) dba OMAR MARKET; CARMELA ) ABBATTISTA, Trustee of THE FAMILY ) TRUST OF CARMELA ABBATTISTA AND ) ITALO A. ABBATTISTA, dated August 30, ) 2001; ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________ ) 18 WHEREAS: 19 1. Plaintiff JOSE TRUJILLO filed his complaint in this action on March 6, 2017. 20 2. This is the second request for an extension of time for WADHAH AHMED OMAR 21 MOHAMMED dba OMAR MARKET and CARMELA ABBATTISTA, Trustee of THE FAMILY 22 TRUST OF CARMELA ABBATTISTA AND ITALO A. ABBATTISTA, dated August 30, 2001 23 (“Defendants”). A previous stipulation for extension of time was granted by local rule and 24 therefore court approval is required for a further extension of time. A joint status report is due on 25 or about July 31, 2017. 26 3. Plaintiff and Defendants continue to be in settlement negotiations at this time, but time is 27 needed to conclude the terms of a settlement. 28 4. The parties agree and submit that settlement of this case prior to the preparation of a joint status Jose Trujillo v. Wadhah Ahmed Omar Mohammed, et al. Second Stipulation and Order For Extension of Time 1 Case No. 1:17-cv-00313 1 report would save valuable court time and resources. 2 5. The parties have agreed to extend Defendants’ time to respond to the complaint until June 15, 3 2017 subject to the court's approval, and believe that the case can be settled within that time. 4 5 NOW THEREFORE, Defendants through their attorneys, and Plaintiff JOSE TRUJILLO through 6 his attorneys, hereby stipulate and agree that the time for WADHAH AHMED OMAR 7 MOHAMMED dba OMAR MARKET and CARMELA ABBATTISTA, Trustee of THE FAMILY 8 TRUST OF CARMELA ABBATTISTA AND ITALO A. ABBATTISTA, dated August 30, 2001 9 to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be extended up to and including June 15, 10 2017, pending court approval. 11 12 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 13 14 15 Dated: May 25, 2017 Dated: May 25, 2017 16 17 MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C. /s/Zachary M. Best Zachary M. Best, Attorney for Plaintiff Jose Acosta /s/Bruce A. Neilson Bruce A. Neilson, Attorney for Defendants, Wadhah Ahmed Omar Mohammed and Carmela Abbattista 18 19 ORDER 20 IT IS SO ORDERED that defendants WADHAH AHMED OMAR MOHAMMED dba OMAR 21 MARKET and CARMELA ABBATTISTA, Trustee of THE FAMILY TRUST OF CARMELA 22 ABBATTISTA AND ITALO A. ABBATTISTA, dated August 30, 2001, shall have until June 15, 23 2017 to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. 24 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 28, 2017 27 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 Jose Trujillo v. Wadhah Ahmed Omar Mohammed, et al. Second Stipulation and Order For Extension of Time 2 Case No. 1:17-cv-00313 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Jose Trujillo v. Wadhah Ahmed Omar Mohammed, et al. Second Stipulation and Order For Extension of Time 3 Case No. 1:17-cv-00313

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?