Ruiz v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 65

ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO FILE A JOINT REPORT EXPLAINING WHY THE COURT SHOULD RETAIN JURISDICTION OVER SETTLEMENT. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file a joint report on or before November 13, 2017, explaining why the Court should retain jurisdiction over the terms of the settlement agreement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/8/2017. (Hernandez, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

DANIEL S. RUIZ,
Plaintiff,

10

ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO FILE A
JOINT REPORT EXPLAINING WHY THE
COURT SHOULD RETAIN JURISDICTION
OVER SETTLEMENT

v.

11
12

Case No. 1:17-cv-00321-LJO-SAB

WELLS FARGO, N.A., et al.,
(ECF No. 64)
Defendants.

13

RESPONSE DUE: NOVEMBER 13, 2017
14
On November 7, 2017, Plaintiff and Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

15

16 (“Experian”) filed a stipulation for dismissal of the claims against Experian, the last remaining
17 defendant in this action. (ECF No. 64.) The parties request that the Court retain jurisdiction
18 over the terms of the settlement agreement, but do not explain why. The Court notes that the
19 settlement was not reached at a settlement conference that the Court conducted.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file a joint report on or

20

21 before November 13, 2017, explaining why the Court should retain jurisdiction over the terms of
22 the settlement agreement.
23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25 Dated:

November 8, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28

1