Ruiz v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO FILE A JOINT REPORT EXPLAINING WHY THE COURT SHOULD RETAIN JURISDICTION OVER SETTLEMENT. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file a joint report on or before November 13, 2017, explaining why the Court should retain jurisdiction over the terms of the settlement agreement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/8/2017. (Hernandez, M)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DANIEL S. RUIZ,
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO FILE A
JOINT REPORT EXPLAINING WHY THE
COURT SHOULD RETAIN JURISDICTION
Case No. 1:17-cv-00321-LJO-SAB
WELLS FARGO, N.A., et al.,
(ECF No. 64)
RESPONSE DUE: NOVEMBER 13, 2017
On November 7, 2017, Plaintiff and Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
16 (“Experian”) filed a stipulation for dismissal of the claims against Experian, the last remaining
17 defendant in this action. (ECF No. 64.) The parties request that the Court retain jurisdiction
18 over the terms of the settlement agreement, but do not explain why. The Court notes that the
19 settlement was not reached at a settlement conference that the Court conducted.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file a joint report on or
21 before November 13, 2017, explaining why the Court should retain jurisdiction over the terms of
22 the settlement agreement.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
November 8, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?