Huizar v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 21

STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the parties' request for an extension of time to 5/10/2017 for defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., to file a responsive pleading. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 4/26/2017. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 MARY KATE SULLIVAN (State Bar No. 180203) 2 ALISA A. GIVENTAL (State Bar No. 273551) 3 SEVERSON & WERSON A Professional Corporation 4 One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600 San Francisco, California 94111 5 Telephone: (415) 398-3344 Facsimile: (415) 956-0439 6 Attorneys for Defendants 7 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SANDRA HUIZAR, Case No. 1:17-CV-00322-LJO-EPG 11 SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE FOR WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT; ORDER 12 Plaintiff, vs. 13 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., COMENITY BANK/LANE 14 BRYANT, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., TRANS UNION LLC, 15 AND EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC., 16 Defendant. 17 18 Complaint Filed: March 6, 2017 Complaint Served: March 8, 2017 Initial Response Date: March 29, 2017 New Response Date: May 10, 2017 Plaintiff Sandra Huizar (“Plaintiff”) and defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Defendant”) 19 hereby stipulate as follows: 20 WHEREAS, on March 6, 2017, Plaintiff filed the instant action; 21 WHEREAS, on March 8, 2017, Defendant was served with the Complaint; 22 WHEREAS, Defendant’s response to the Complaint is currently due on March 29, 2017; 23 WHEREAS, Defendant, through counsel, requested and Plaintiff, through counsel, granted 24 a 28-day extension of time for Wells Fargo to respond to the Complaint; 25 WHEREAS, Defendant and Plaintiff are engaged in settlement discussions in an effort to 26 resolve the dispute being litigated in this action; 27 WHEREAS, Defendant and Plaintiff agree that an additional two-week extension for Wells 28 Fargo to respond to the Complaint will assist the parties in their settlement efforts; 1:17-CV-00322-LJO-EPG 08999.0207/10692647.1 1 SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE FOR WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT; ORDER 1 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant stipulate as follows: 2 1. The time for Defendant to respond to the complaint shall be extended by an 3 additional 14 days up to and including May 10, 2017. 4 2. This stipulation is without prejudice to the rights, claims, arguments and defenses 5 of all parties. 6 DATED: April 25, 2017 7 SEVERSON & WERSON A Professional Corporation By: 8 /s/ Alisa A. Givental Alisa A. Givental 9 Attorneys for Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. 10 11 DATED: April 25, 2017 12 LAW OFFICE OF CLARK OVRUCHESKY By: /s/ Clark Ovruchesky Clark Ovruchesky 13 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff SANDRA HUIZAR 15 16 I, Alisa A. Givental, attest that Clark Ovruchesky, on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concurs in the filing’s content and has authorized the filing. /s/ Alisa A, Givental 17 ORDER 18 19 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, Wells Fargo Bank, 20 N.A.’s deadline to respond to plaintiff Sandra Huizar’s Initial Complaint is hereby continued to 21 May 10, 2017. No other deadlines shall be affected by this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 Dated: April 26, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28 1:17-CV-00322-LJO-EPG 2 SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE FOR WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT; ORDER 08999.0207/10692647.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?