Huizar v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 45

ORDER APPROVING Stipulation to Dismiss Complaint as Against Comenity Bank Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/12/2017. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION

9
10

SANDRA HUIZAR,
Plaintiff,

11
12
13
14
15
16

Case No.: 1:17-cv-00322-LJO-EPG
Hon. District Judge Lawrence J. O’Neill
Hon. Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean

v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
COMENITY BANK/ LANE
BRYANT, EXPERIAN
INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
INC., TRANS UNION LLC, and
EQUIFAX INFORMATION
SERVICES LLC,

17

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO
DISMISS COMPLAINT AS AGAINST
COMENITY BANK PURSUANT TO
FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
41(a)(1)(A)(ii)

Hearing: [No Hearing Required]

Defendants.

18
19

The Court having considered the Stipulation to Dismiss Complaint as Against Comenity Bank

20

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) (the “Stipulation”) entered into by and

21

between plaintiff Sandra Huizar (“Plaintiff”) and defendant Comenity Bank (erroneously sued as

22

Comenity Bank/Lane Bryant) (“Comenity”), and good cause appearing therefor,

23

IT IS ORDERED that the Stipulation is APPROVED.

24

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice as against

25

Comenity.

26

///

27

///

28
1
CASE NO. 1:17-cv-00322-LJO-EPG
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT AS AGAINST COMENITY BANK

29
619209.1

30

1

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for the purpose of

2

enforcing the terms of the separate settlement agreement entered into between Plaintiff and

3

Comenity.

4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

July 12, 2017

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____
UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
CASE NO. 1:17-cv-00322-LJO-EPG
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT AS AGAINST COMENITY BANK

29
619209.1

30