Huizar v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
ORDER Directing the Clerk of Court to Terminate Defendant Bank of America, N.A. signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/26/2017. (Jessen, A)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,
Case No. 1:17-cv-00322-LJO-EPG
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF
THE COURT TO TERMINATE
DEFENDANT BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
(ECF No. 56)
On September 26, 2017, Plaintiffs and Defendant Bank of America, N.A. filed a
stipulation voluntary dismissal of their claims against Defendant Bank of America, N.A. (ECF
No. 56). Thus, the claims against Defendant Bank of America, N.A. have been terminated, see
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and
dismissed with prejudice. Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“Even if the
defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his action voluntarily by filing
a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1).”).
Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to terminate Defendant Bank of
America, N.A. on the docket.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
September 26, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?