Huizar v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 63

STIPULATION and ORDER of Dismissal with prejudice as to Defendant, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 12/6/2017. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 C.O. LAW, APC Clark Ovruchesky, Esq. (SBN: 301844) co@colawcalifornia.com 750 B. Street, Suite 3300 San Diego, California 92101 Telephone: (619) 356-8960 Facsimile: (619) 330-7610 5 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Sandra Huizar UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 SANDRA HUIZAR, Plaintiff, vs. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., COMENITY BANK/ LANE BRYANT, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., TRANS UNION LLC, and EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC; Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:17-cv-00322-LJOEPG STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. ORDER TO CLOSE CASE 16 17 Plaintiff Sandra Huizar (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 18 (“WFBNA”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their counsel of record, hereby 19 stipulate and agree that Plaintiff’s claims against WFBNA should be dismissed, with prejudice, 20 21 with Plaintiff and WFBNA to each bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees. The Parties agree that this Court can proceed to dismiss Defendant WFBNA, with prejudice, from this action. Respectfully submitted, 22 23 Date: December 5, 2017 24 25 26 27 28 Date: December 5, 2017 /s/ Clark Ovruchesky, Esq. C.O. LAW, APC 750 B. Street, Suite 3300 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (619) 356-8960 Fax: (619) 330-7610 E-Mail: co@colawcalifornia.com Counsel for Sandra Huizar /s/ Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 Alisa A. Givental Severson & Werson, APC One Embarcadero Center, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 677-5503 Fax: (415) 956-0439 E-Mail: aag@severson.com Counsel for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2 of 3 1 ORDER 2 On December 5, 2017, Plaintiffs and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. filed a stipulation voluntary 3 dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (ECF No. 56). Thus, 4 the claims against Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. have been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and dismissed 6 with prejudice. Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“Even if the defendant 7 has filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his action voluntarily by filing a notice 8 of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1).”). Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, Plaintiff Sandra Huizar 9 and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. shall each bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees. By separate stipulations filed previously in this case, all claims against all defendants 10 11 have been dismissed. (ECF Nos. 41, 44, 57, 61). Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to close this 12 case. 13 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 6, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?