Bullard v. St. Andra et al

Filing 123

ORDER ADOPTING 122 Findings and Recommendations signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/25/2022. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EFREN DANIELLE BULLARD, 12 No. 1:17-cv-00328-DAD-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 BENSON, et al., 15 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. No. 122) Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Efren Danielle Bullard is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S. § 1983. This matter was referred to a 19 United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On March 29, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, 21 recommending that plaintiff’s motion seeking to find defendants in breach of settlement 22 agreement be denied. (Doc. No. 122.) Those findings and recommendations were served on 23 plaintiff and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) 24 days of service. (Id. at 3.) To date, no objections to the findings and recommendations have been 25 filed with the court, and the time in which to do so has now passed. 26 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a 27 de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings 28 and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 1 1 Accordingly, 2 1. 3 4 adopted; 2. 5 6 9 10 Plaintiff’s motion for breach of settlement agreement (Doc. No. 117) is denied; and 3. 7 8 The findings and recommendations issued on March 29, 2022 (Doc. No. 122) are This case remains pursuant to the stipulation of voluntary dismissal and subsequent order. (See Doc. Nos. 114, 115.) IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 25, 2022 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?