Bullard v. St. Andra et al
Filing
123
ORDER ADOPTING 122 Findings and Recommendations signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/25/2022. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
EFREN DANIELLE BULLARD,
12
No. 1:17-cv-00328-DAD-HBK (PC)
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
BENSON, et al.,
15
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
(Doc. No. 122)
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff Efren Danielle Bullard is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
18
pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S. § 1983. This matter was referred to a
19
United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On March 29, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations,
21
recommending that plaintiff’s motion seeking to find defendants in breach of settlement
22
agreement be denied. (Doc. No. 122.) Those findings and recommendations were served on
23
plaintiff and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14)
24
days of service. (Id. at 3.) To date, no objections to the findings and recommendations have been
25
filed with the court, and the time in which to do so has now passed.
26
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a
27
de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings
28
and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
1
1
Accordingly,
2
1.
3
4
adopted;
2.
5
6
9
10
Plaintiff’s motion for breach of settlement agreement (Doc. No. 117) is denied;
and
3.
7
8
The findings and recommendations issued on March 29, 2022 (Doc. No. 122) are
This case remains pursuant to the stipulation of voluntary dismissal and
subsequent order. (See Doc. Nos. 114, 115.)
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
April 25, 2022
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?