Bullard v. St. Andra et al

Filing 84

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 81 Miscellaneous Motion, signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 2/3/2020. (Orozco, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 EFREN DANIELLE BULLARD, Case No. 1:17-cv-00328-NONE-JDP ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MISCELLANEOUS MOTION Plaintiff, 10 11 v. 12 BENSON, et al. ECF No. 81 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 Plaintiff Efren Bullard is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights 17 action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 4, 2019, plaintiff filed a miscellaneous 18 motion. ECF 81. While this motion is labeled as a “dispositive motion,” it does not seek any 19 dispositive relief, and so we will not treat it as dispositive. See Andersen v. United States, 298 20 F.3d 804, 807 (9th Cir. 2002) (“The substance of the motion, not its form, controls its 21 disposition.”). Dispositive motions typically seek to dispose of all or some claims in favor of 22 the moving party. Instead, plaintiff’s motion argues that his own claims should not be 23 dismissed at this stage in the litigation. See id. at 2 (“[P]laintiff will do the best he can on this 24 dispositive motion to present the facts in this civil matter so that his claims will not be 25 dismissed.”). Because defendants have no pending motions seeking dismissal, we are not 26 currently considering dismissal of any of plaintiff’s claims. We will therefore deny plaintiff’s 27 miscellaneous motion as unnecessary. 28 We believe plaintiff may have operated under the assumption that he was required to file 1 1 a motion by the relevant dispositive-motion deadline. See id. at 1 (“Plaintiff had to look up the 2 word ‘dispositive motion’ in the Blacks Law dictionary to find out what [he] was supposed to 3 do in regards to a [Dispositive] Motion.”) (emphasis added). This is not the case; dispositive 4 motions are not required. However, plaintiff should be aware that he suffers no prejudice from 5 filing the motion or from having it denied as unnecessary. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: February 3, 2020 9 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 No. 205. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?