Contreras v. Fresno County Employee's Retirement Association

Filing 9

ORDER regarding Clarification of Plaintiff's Monthly Income, TEN (10) DAY DEADLINE, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 5/5/2017. (Lafata, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

LETICIA CONTRERAS,

10
11
12
13

1:17-cv-00329-DAD-MJS
ORDER

Plaintiff,

TEN (10) DAY DEADLINE

v.
FRESNO COUNTY EMPLOYEES’
RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION,
Defendant.

14
15
16
17

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. Pending are Plaintiff’s three Motions to
Proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 2-4.)

18

On review, the Court finds that Plaintiff has submitted inconsistent statements

19

regarding her monthly income. On one hand, she claims that “I do not currently have any

20

income,” (ECF No. 2 at 1), and on the other hand, she claims to be presently employed

21

by Fresno County with a gross monthly income of $4,600 (ECF No. 4 at 2). Accordingly,

22

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall submit within ten days from the date of this

23

Order a statement of clarification regarding her monthly income.

24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26

Dated:

May 5, 2017

/s/

Michael J. Seng

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1