Contreras v. Fresno County Employee's Retirement Association

Filing 9

ORDER regarding Clarification of Plaintiff's Monthly Income, TEN (10) DAY DEADLINE, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 5/5/2017. (Lafata, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 LETICIA CONTRERAS, 10 11 12 13 1:17-cv-00329-DAD-MJS ORDER Plaintiff, TEN (10) DAY DEADLINE v. FRESNO COUNTY EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION, Defendant. 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. Pending are Plaintiff’s three Motions to Proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 2-4.) 18 On review, the Court finds that Plaintiff has submitted inconsistent statements 19 regarding her monthly income. On one hand, she claims that “I do not currently have any 20 income,” (ECF No. 2 at 1), and on the other hand, she claims to be presently employed 21 by Fresno County with a gross monthly income of $4,600 (ECF No. 4 at 2). Accordingly, 22 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall submit within ten days from the date of this 23 Order a statement of clarification regarding her monthly income. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: May 5, 2017 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?