Garcia v. Kakish et al

Filing 7

ORDER EXTENDING Defendant's Time to Answer Plaintiff's Complaint 6 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 4/12/2017. Responsive pleading due by 4/21/2017. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JUSTIN GARCIA, Case No.: 1:17-cv-00374-LJO-JLT 12 ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT'S TIME TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 MUSHEER A. KAKISH, ET AL., 15 (Doc. 6) Defendant. 16 Counsel have filed a stipulation1 to extend the deadline by which the defendant will file a 17 18 responsive pleading. (Doc. 6) They report they need additional time to discuss resolution of the 19 matter. Id. Therefore, good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS the stipulation. Respondents 20 SHALL file their responsive pleading no later than April 21, 2017. Absolutely no further extensions of time will be granted. 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: April 12, 2017 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 1 Notably, no order was required given the amount of time requested for the extension of time does not exceed 28 28 days. L.R. 144(a). However, in light of the fact that counsel lodged a proposed order, the Court addresses the stipulation here.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?