Garcia v. Kakish et al

Filing 7

ORDER EXTENDING Defendant's Time to Answer Plaintiff's Complaint 6 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 4/12/2017. Responsive pleading due by 4/21/2017. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11 JUSTIN GARCIA,

Case No.: 1:17-cv-00374-LJO-JLT

12

ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT'S
TIME TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S
COMPLAINT

Plaintiff,

13

vs.

14 MUSHEER A. KAKISH, ET AL.,
15

(Doc. 6)

Defendant.

16
Counsel have filed a stipulation1 to extend the deadline by which the defendant will file a

17

18 responsive pleading. (Doc. 6) They report they need additional time to discuss resolution of the
19 matter. Id. Therefore, good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS the stipulation. Respondents
20 SHALL file their responsive pleading no later than April 21, 2017.
Absolutely no further extensions of time will be granted.

21
22

23 IT IS SO ORDERED.
24

Dated:

April 12, 2017

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26
27

1

Notably, no order was required given the amount of time requested for the extension of time does not exceed 28

28 days. L.R. 144(a). However, in light of the fact that counsel lodged a proposed order, the Court addresses the
stipulation here.