Griffin v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Filing 82

ORDER AFTER NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT. The parties report they had come to terms of settlement. (Doc. 81) They indicate they will seek dismissal of the action soon. Id. at 2. Thus, the Court ORDERS: 1. The stipulation to dismiss the action SHALL be filed no later than March 8, 2019; 2. All pending dates, conferences and hearings are VACATED. The parties are advised that failure to comply with this order may result in the Court imposing sanctions, including the dismissal of the action. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 2/11/2019. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 ) Case No.: 1:17-cv-0384 - JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER AFTER NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT ) v. ) (Doc. 81) ) UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ) ) Defendant. ) JOHNNY GRIFFIN, 16 17 18 The parties report they had come to terms of settlement. (Doc. 81) They indicate they will seek dismissal of the action soon. Id. at 2. Thus, the Court ORDERS: 19 1. The stipulation to dismiss the action SHALL be filed no later than March 8, 2019; 20 2. All pending dates, conferences and hearings are VACATED. 21 The parties are advised that failure to comply with this order may result in the Court imposing 22 sanctions, including the dismissal of the action. 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 11, 2019 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?