Gonzales v. Rutledge et al
Filing
4
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending That Plaintiff's Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs Be Denied 2 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/6/17: 14-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GERARDO GONZALES,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
Case No. 1:17-cv-00387-LJO-BAM
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S
APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT
PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS BE DENIED
BILL RUTLEDGE, et al.,
(Doc. 2)
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff Gerardo Gonzales (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se in this civil matter. Plaintiff
18
initiated this action on March 16, 2017. (Doc. 1). On the same day, Plaintiff filed an application
19
to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 2).
According to Plaintiff’s application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs, he
20
21
receives a retirement pension of $1,378.00 each month and receives a worker’s compensation
22
payment of $1,080.00 each month.1 He also has $3,490.00 in cash or in a checking or savings
23
account. (Doc. 2 at 1-2). Additionally, Plaintiff’s expenses include discretionary amounts for
24
“cable” and vague expenses, such as “security,” “bug spray,” and “household goods.” (Doc. 2 at
25
2.)
The Court finds that Plaintiff has not made the showing required by section 1915(a) that
26
27
28
1
Plaintiff also itemizes gross pay or wages of $1,948.00, but lists his employment as
“Disable.” (Doc. 2 at 1).
1
1
he is unable to pay the required fees for this action. Accordingly, the Court HEREBY
2
RECOMMENDS that:
3
1. Plaintiff’s application to proceed without prepayment of fees and costs (ECF No. 2) be
4
DENIED; and
5
2. Plaintiff be required to pay the $400.00 filing fee in full to proceed with this action.
6
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
7
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen
8
(14) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, Plaintiff may file written
9
objections with the Court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate
10
Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within
11
the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal. Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d
12
834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)).
13
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
April 6, 2017
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?