Randolph v. Matevousian

Filing 20

ORDER Granting Respondent's 19 Motion for Extension of Time Nunc Pro Tunc signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 08/16/2017. (Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
DEVONNE RANDOLPH,

CASE NO. 1:17-cv-00397-LJO-SKO HC

10
Petitioner,
11

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
NUNC PRO TUNC

v.
12
WARDEN MATEVOUSIAN,
13
Respondent.
14

(Doc. 19)

15
16
17
18

On August 15, 2017, Respondent filed a response to the petition for writ of habeas corpus in the
above-captioned case and moved for a one-day enlargement of time. By declaration, Respondent’s
counsel stated that due to the press of business, counsel required additional time to prepare a response.

19
20
21

Good cause having been shown, the Court hereby ORDERS that the time for Respondent to
answer the petition in the above-captioned case shall be extended nunc pro tunc for 1 day to August 15,
2017.

22
23 IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25

Dated:

August 16, 2017

/s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28
29
30

Sheila K. Oberto

1

.