Randolph v. Matevousian

Filing 20

ORDER Granting Respondent's 19 Motion for Extension of Time Nunc Pro Tunc signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 08/16/2017. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 DEVONNE RANDOLPH, CASE NO. 1:17-cv-00397-LJO-SKO HC 10 Petitioner, 11 ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME NUNC PRO TUNC v. 12 WARDEN MATEVOUSIAN, 13 Respondent. 14 (Doc. 19) 15 16 17 18 On August 15, 2017, Respondent filed a response to the petition for writ of habeas corpus in the above-captioned case and moved for a one-day enlargement of time. By declaration, Respondent’s counsel stated that due to the press of business, counsel required additional time to prepare a response. 19 20 21 Good cause having been shown, the Court hereby ORDERS that the time for Respondent to answer the petition in the above-captioned case shall be extended nunc pro tunc for 1 day to August 15, 2017. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: August 16, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 29 30 Sheila K. Oberto 1 .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?