Daniels Sharpsmart, Inc. v. Smith, et al.

Filing 49

PARTIES JOINT STATUS REPORT AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY SO ORDERED THAT the stay in this matter is CONTINUED to July 30, 2018. It is further ordered that the parties shall submit a joint status report thirty days from the date of entry of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/3/2018. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 XAVIER BECERRA, State Bar No. 118517 Attorney General of California ISMAEL A. CASTRO, State Bar No. 85452 Supervising Deputy Attorney General RENU R. GEORGE, State Bar No. 262310 KARLI EISENBERG, State Bar No. 281923 Deputy Attorneys General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Telephone: (916) 210-7913 Fax: (916) 324-5567 E-mail: Karli.Eisenberg@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendants Karen Smith, et al. 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 DANIELS SHARPSMART, INC., Plaintiff, PARTIES’ JOINT STATUS REPORT 14 15 1:17-cv-00403-LJO-SAB v. Judge: The Honorable Lawrence O’Neill Trial Date: None Set Action Filed: March 20, 2017 16 KAREN SMITH, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 JOINT STATUS REPORT Plaintiff Daniels Sharpsmart, Inc. and Defendants Karen Smith, et al. (collectively “Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby file this Joint Status Report and Stipulation: WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a Complaint on March 20, 2017 naming Karen Smith, et al. as Defendants in this action; WHEREAS, on June 13, 2017, this Court denied Defendants’ motion to dismiss and granted Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction; WHEREAS, on July 12, 2017, Defendants appealed this Court’s June 13, 2017 order; WHEREAS, on May 2, 2018, the Ninth Circuit issued an opinion affirming in part and reversing in part this Court’s June 13, 2017 order; WHEREAS, on May 24, 2018, the Ninth Circuit issued its mandate; WHEREAS, the parties have been in settlement discussions since the issuance of the mandate and agree that staying the district court matter an additional fourteen days, until July 30, 2018, while these settlement discussions continue will preserve both judicial resources and each of the parties’ resources. WHEREAS, the parties further agree that they will submit a joint report on the status of the settlement discussions thirty days from the date of the Court’s order granting the parties’ request for a stay. NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE that this case be stayed until July 30, 2018 while the parties continue settlement discussions. The parties further stipulate to file a joint status report thirty days from the date of the Court’s order granting the parties’ request for a stay. 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 Dated: July 2, 2018 Respectfully submitted, 2 XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California ISMAEL A. CASTRO Supervising Deputy Attorney General 3 4 5 6 /s/ Renu R. George /s/ Karli Eisenberg RENU R. GEORGE KARLI EISENBERG Deputy Attorneys General Attorneys for Defendants Karen Smith, et al. 7 8 9 10 Dated: July 2, 2018 Respectfully submitted, 11 STEPTOE & JOHNSON 12 13 14 /s/ Jason Levin (as authorized on 07/02/2018) JASON LEVIN Attorneys for Plaintiff Daniels Sharpsmart, Inc. 15 16 17 18 SA2017106433 13142866.doc 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 1 ORDER 2 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY SO ORDERED THAT the stay in 3 this matter is CONTINUED to July 30, 2018. It is further ordered that the parties shall submit a 4 joint status report thirty days from the date of entry of this order. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 3, 2018 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?