Jose Acosta v. Godinez Auto Body Parts and Repairs Incorporated et al
Filing
18
STIPULATION and ORDER FOR FOURTH EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT is REJECTED, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 6/7/2017. (Lafata, M)
1
2
3
4
5
Zachary M. Best, SBN 166035
MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
Email: service@mission.legal
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Jose Acosta
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
JOSE ACOSTA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
GODINEZ AUTO BODY PARTS AND
REPAIRS INCORPORTED, et al.,
15
16
17
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 1:17-cv-00409-DAD-MJS
STIPULATION FOR FOURTH
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT; ORDER
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; ORDER
Page 1
1
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Jose Acosta (“Plaintiff”), by and through his attorney of record,
2
and Defendant Godinez Auto Body Parts and Repairs Incorported (“Defendant,” and together
3
with Plaintiff, “the Parties”), by and through their counsel of record, previously entered into a
4
stipulation granting Defendant to and including June 5, 2017 to file a responsive pleading in
5
this matter (Dkt. 16);
6
WHEREAS, the Parties are engaged in settlement negotiations and are hopeful that a
7
settlement can be reached informally, and desire to conserve attorney’s fees which would be
8
incurred in filing the responsive pleading while they exhaust settlement efforts;
9
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties
10
that Defendant may have to and including June 16, 2017 to file a responsive pleading in this
11
matter. This extension of time does not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed
12
by Court order.
13
14
Date: June 5, 2017
MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.
15
/s/ Zachary M. Best
Zachary M. Best
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Jose Acosta
16
17
18
19
Date: June 5, 2017
LAW OFFICES OF STANLEY MA
/s/ Stanley Ma
Stanley Ma
Attorneys for Defendant
Godinez Auto Body Parts and Repairs
Incorported
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; ORDER
Page 2
ORDER
1
2
3
The Parties’ Stipulation to grant a Fourth extension of time for Defendant,
Godinez Auto Body Parts and Repairs, Inc., to file a responsive pleading in case no.
4
5
1:17-cv-00409 is REJECTED.
6
7
In its May 24, 2017, Order, granting a third requested extension, the Court
advised.
8
“There shall be no more such extensions absent new
and presently unforeseeable good cause.” (Emphasis in original.)
9
10
Unless Plaintiff sooner files a request for voluntary dismissal of this action,
11
Defendant shall file its responsive pleading or or before June 9, 2017.
12
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
Dated:
17
June 7, 2017
/s/
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
18
19
.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; ORDER
Page 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?