Jose Acosta v. Godinez Auto Body Parts and Repairs Incorporated et al

Filing 18

STIPULATION and ORDER FOR FOURTH EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT is REJECTED, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 6/7/2017. (Lafata, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Zachary M. Best, SBN 166035 MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C. 332 North Second Street San Jose, California 95112 Telephone (408) 298-2000 Facsimile (408) 298-6046 Email: service@mission.legal Attorneys for Plaintiff Jose Acosta 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 JOSE ACOSTA, Plaintiff, vs. GODINEZ AUTO BODY PARTS AND REPAIRS INCORPORTED, et al., 15 16 17 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:17-cv-00409-DAD-MJS STIPULATION FOR FOURTH EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; ORDER Page 1 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiff Jose Acosta (“Plaintiff”), by and through his attorney of record, 2 and Defendant Godinez Auto Body Parts and Repairs Incorported (“Defendant,” and together 3 with Plaintiff, “the Parties”), by and through their counsel of record, previously entered into a 4 stipulation granting Defendant to and including June 5, 2017 to file a responsive pleading in 5 this matter (Dkt. 16); 6 WHEREAS, the Parties are engaged in settlement negotiations and are hopeful that a 7 settlement can be reached informally, and desire to conserve attorney’s fees which would be 8 incurred in filing the responsive pleading while they exhaust settlement efforts; 9 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties 10 that Defendant may have to and including June 16, 2017 to file a responsive pleading in this 11 matter. This extension of time does not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed 12 by Court order. 13 14 Date: June 5, 2017 MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C. 15 /s/ Zachary M. Best Zachary M. Best Attorneys for Plaintiff Jose Acosta 16 17 18 19 Date: June 5, 2017 LAW OFFICES OF STANLEY MA /s/ Stanley Ma Stanley Ma Attorneys for Defendant Godinez Auto Body Parts and Repairs Incorported 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; ORDER Page 2 ORDER 1 2 3 The Parties’ Stipulation to grant a Fourth extension of time for Defendant, Godinez Auto Body Parts and Repairs, Inc., to file a responsive pleading in case no. 4 5 1:17-cv-00409 is REJECTED. 6 7 In its May 24, 2017, Order, granting a third requested extension, the Court advised. 8 “There shall be no more such extensions absent new and presently unforeseeable good cause.” (Emphasis in original.) 9 10 Unless Plaintiff sooner files a request for voluntary dismissal of this action, 11 Defendant shall file its responsive pleading or or before June 9, 2017. 12 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 Dated: 17 June 7, 2017 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 19 . 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; ORDER Page 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?