Jose Acosta v. Retail Vision, Inc. et al

Filing 11

THIRD STIPULATION and ORDER For Extension of Time For All Defendants to Respond to Complaint and FIRST STIPULATION and ORDER to Continue Mandatory Scheduling Conference. Defendants RETAIL VISION, INC., dba RASMEY MARKET; CHIEU HUA HENG; and SIV HUN KHOEU (collectively herein "Defendants"), shall have until 6/30/2017, to respond to the Complaint. The Scheduling Conference currently set for 6/27/2017, is CONTINUED to 8/8/2017, at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/6/2017. (Timken, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Roger S. Bonakdar, #253920
2344 TULARE ST., SUITE 301
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93721
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

Attorneys for Defendants RETAIL VISION, INC., dba RASMEY MARKET; CHIEU HUA
HENG; SIV HUN KHOEU

8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOSE ACOSTA,

12

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14
15
16

RETAIL VISION, INC., dba RASMEY
MARKET; CHIEU HUA HENG; SIV HUN
KHOEU

17

Defendants.

18

Case No. 17-cv-00410-DAD-SKO
THIRD STIPULATION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR ALL
DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT; and
FIRST STIPULATIONTO CONTINUE
MANDATORY SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE
ORDER
(Doc. 10)

19
20
Plaintiff JOSE ACOSTA (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants RETAIL VISION, INC., dba

21
22

RASMEY MARKET; CHIEU HUA HENG; and SIV HUN KHOEU (collectively

23

“Defendants,” and together with Plaintiff, “the Parties”), by and through their respective

24

counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

25
WHEREAS the Parties previously stipulated to extensions of time for
26
Defendants to respond to the Complaint, with the present due date being June 5,
27
28

2017.
1
THIRD STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; and TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE;
ORDER

1

WHEREAS the Parties were, and continue to be, exploring an early resolution

2

and settlement of this matter which resolution included an accessibility survey of the

3

subject property conducted by Defendants, which survey was provided today to

4

Plaintiff for review and consideration in furtherance of the Parties’ settlement efforts..

5

WHEREAS the Parties believe it to be mutually desirable to avoid further costs

6
of litigation by discussing, exploring, and exhausting efforts at an informal resolution;
7
WHEREAS the Parties wish to conserve party and court resources so that they
8
9
10

may be applied towards a resolution;
WHEREAS the Mandatory Scheduling Conference is currently set for June 27,

11

2017 which will not afford the Parties time to fully explore and exhaust their ongoing

12

settlement efforts;

13

WHEREAS in light of the foregoing, the Parties wish to continue the Mandatory

14

Scheduling Conference to a date on or after July 14, 2017 at the Court’s convenience

15

in order to explore settlement.

16
17

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that pursuant to Local Rule
144(a), Defendants’ Answer or Response to Complaint, due on June 5, 2017, is now

18
due on June 30, 2017.
19
20
21

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the Scheduling Conference be continued to
a date on or after July 14, 2017 at the convenience of the Court.

22

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

23

Date: June 5, 2017

MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C/

24
/s/ Zachary M. Best______________
ZACHARY BEST
Attorneys for Plaintiff

25
26
27
28

Date: June 5, 2017

BONAKDAR LAW FIRM

2
THIRD STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; and TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE;
ORDER

1
2
3

/S/ Roger S. Bonakdar
ROGER S. BONAKDAR
Attorney for Defendants

4
5

{Order on next page}

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
THIRD STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; and TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE;
ORDER

ORDER

1
2

Pursuant to the Parties’ Stipulation and good cause appearing,

3

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants RETAIL VISION, INC., dba

4
5

RASMEY MARKET; CHIEU HUA HENG; and SIV HUN KHOEU (collectively herein
“Defendants”), shall have until June 30, 2017, to respond to the Complaint;

6
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference scheduled for
7
June 27, 2017, is hereby continued to August 8, 2017 at 10:30 am. The Parties are to
8
9
10

file their Joint Scheduling Report no later than seven days prior to the conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
12

Dated:

June 6, 2017

/s/

Sheila K. Oberto

.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

4
THIRD STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; and TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE;
ORDER