Salinas v. FCA US LLC

Filing 10

SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 5/17/2017. Consent/Decline due within 10 days. Motion to Remand Deadline 6/5/2017. Pleading Amendment Deadline 8/14/2017. Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures 5/19/2017; Non -Expert 3/23/2018; Expert 6/11/2018. Mid-Discovery Status Conference set for 12/4/2017 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 6/19/2018; Hearing by 7/17/20 18. Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 7/31/2018; Hearing by 9/18/2018. Settlement Conference set for 1/5/2018 at 09:30 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Pretrial Conference set for 11/26/2018 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. Jury Trial set for 3/12/2019 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

EDITH SALINAS,
Plaintiff,

11
12
13
14
15

v.
FCA US LLC,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:17-cv-00419 - DAD - JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Motion to Remand Deadline: 6/5/2017
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 8/14/2017
Discovery Deadlines:
Initial Disclosures: 5/19/2017
Non-Expert: 3/23/2018
Expert: 6/11/2018
Mid-Discovery Status Conference:
12/4/2017 at 8:30 a.m.

16
17

Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 6/19/2018
Hearing: 7/17/2018

18
19

Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 7/31/2018
Hearing: 9/18/2018

20
21

Settlement Conference:
1/5/20185 at 9:30 a.m.
510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA

22
23

Pre-Trial Conference:
11/26/2018 at 2:30 p.m.
Courtroom 5

24
25

Trial:

26
27
28
1

3/12/2019 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 5
Jury trial: 10-12 days

1

I.

May 17, 2017.

2
3

Date of Scheduling Conference

II.

Appearances of Counsel

4

Alastair Hamblin appeared on behalf of Plaintiff.

5

Kristi Livedalen appeared on behalf of Defendant.

6

III.

Magistrate Judge Consent:

7

Notice of Congested Docket and Court Policy of Trailing

8

Due to the District Judges’ heavy caseload, the newly adopted policy of the Fresno Division of

9

the Eastern District is to trail all civil cases. The parties are hereby notified that for a trial date set

10

before a District Judge, the parties will trail indefinitely behind any higher priority criminal or older

11

civil case set on the same date until a courtroom becomes available. The trial date will not be reset to a

12

continued date.
The Magistrate Judges’ availability is far more realistic and accommodating to parties than that

13
14

of the U.S. District Judges who carry the heaviest caseloads in the nation and who must prioritize

15

criminal and older civil cases over more recently filed civil cases. A United States Magistrate Judge

16

may conduct trials, including entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of

17

Civil Procedure 73, and Local Rule 305. Any appeal from a judgment entered by a United States

18

Magistrate Judge is taken directly to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit.
The Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California, whenever possible, is utilizing United

19
20

States Article III District Court Judges from throughout the nation as Visiting Judges. Pursuant to the

21

Local Rules, Appendix A, such reassignments will be random, and the parties will receive no advance

22

notice before their case is reassigned to an Article III District Court Judge from outside of the Eastern

23

District of California.
Therefore, the parties are directed to consider consenting to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction to

24
25

conduct all further proceedings, including trial. Within 10 days of the date of this order, counsel

26

SHALL file a consent/decline form (provided by the Court at the inception of this case) indicating

27

whether they will consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge.

28

///
2

1

IV.

Motion to Remand
Any motion to remand by Plaintiff SHALL be filed by June 5, 2017, and set before the

2
3

Honorable Dale A. Drozd, United States District Court Judge.

4

V.

Pleading Amendment Deadline
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or

5
6

motion to amend, no later than August 14, 2017. Any motion to amend the pleadings shall be heard by

7

the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, United States District Court Judge.

8

VI.

9
10
11
12
13

Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date
The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)

on or before May 19, 2017.
The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before March
23, 2018 and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before June 11, 2018.
Counsel SHALL take the depositions of relevant witnesses in each of the related cases only one

14

time unless both sides agree to deviate. If the deponent will offer testimony as to the unique facts of

15

more than one of the related cases, the party taking the deposition will be entitled to extend the

16

deposition beyond seven hours. However, counsel SHALL meet in advance to come to agreement as

17

to how much additional time will be permitted.

18

The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses1 in writing on or before April 9, 2018,

19

and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before May 14, 2018. The written designation of retained and

20

non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C) and

21

shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in compliance with

22

this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered through such

23

experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.

24

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts

25

and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions

26

included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may

27
28

1

In the event an expert will offer opinions related to an inspection of the vehicle, the inspection SHALL occur
sufficiently in advance of the disclosure deadline so the expert’s report fully details the expert’s opinions in this regard.

3

1

include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement

2
3

disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.
A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for December 4, 2017 at 8:30 a.m. before the

4
5

Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, U.S. Magistrate Judge, located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield,

6

California. Counsel SHALL file a joint mid-discovery status conference report one week before the

7

conference. Counsel also SHALL lodge the status report via e-mail to [e-mail].

8

The joint statement SHALL outline the discovery counsel have completed and that which needs to be

9

completed as well as any impediments to completing the discovery within the deadlines set forth in this

10

order. Counsel may appear via teleconference by dialing [phone] and entering Access Code

11

1652736, provided the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Deputy Clerk receives a written notice of the

12

intent to appear telephonically no later than five court days before the noticed hearing date.

13

VII.

14

Pre-Trial Motion Schedule
All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later

15

than June 19, 2018 and heard on or before July 17, 2018. Discovery motions are heard before the

16

Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge at the United States Courthouse in

17

Bakersfield, California. For these hearings, counsel may appear via teleconference by dialing (888)

18

557-8511 and entering Access Code 1652736, provided the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Deputy

19

Clerk receives a written notice of the intent to appear telephonically no later than five court days before

20

the noticed hearing date. All other non-dispositive hearings SHALL be set before Judge Drozd.

21

No motion to amend or stipulation to amend the case schedule will be entertained unless it

22

is filed at least one week before the first deadline the parties wish to extend. Likewise, no written

23

discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned Magistrate Judge. A party

24

with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good faith effort to resolve by

25

agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the moving party promptly

26

shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate Judge. It shall be the

27

obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the court. To schedule

28

this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Susan Hall, at
4

1

[phone] or via email at [e-mail]. Counsel must comply with Local Rule 251

2

with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice and dropped

3

from the Court’s calendar.
All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than July 31, 2018 and heard no later

4
5

than September 18, 2018, in Courtroom 5 at 9:30 a.m. before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, United

6

States District Court Judge. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56

7

and Local Rules 230 and 260.

8

VIII. Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication

9

At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary

10

adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues

11

to be raised in the motion.

12

The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a

13

question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole

14

or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the

15

issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the

16

expense of briefing a motion; and 6) to develop a joint statement of undisputed facts.
The moving party SHALL initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed

17
18

statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement of

19

undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may be

20

deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the joint

21

statement of undisputed facts.
In the notice of motion the moving party SHALL certify that the parties have met and conferred

22
23

as ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer. Failure to

24

comply may result in the motion being stricken.

25

IX.

Pre-Trial Conference Date

26

November 26, 2018 at 2:30 p.m. in Courtroom 5 before Judge Drozd.

27

The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).

28

The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,
5

1

directly to Judge Drozd's chambers, by email at [e-mail].
Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the

2
3

Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference.

4

The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the

5

Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the

6

Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.

7

X.

March 12, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 5 before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, United

8
9

Trial Date

States District Court Judge.

10

A.

This is a jury trial.

11

B.

Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 10-12 days.

12

C.

Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of

13

California, Rule 285.

14

XI.

15

Settlement Conference
A Settlement Conference is scheduled for January 5, 2018 at 9:30 a.m., located at 510 19th

16

Street, Bakersfield, California. Notwithstanding the provisions of Local Rule 270(b), the settlement

17

conference will be conducted by Magistrate Judge Thurston. The Court deems the deviation from the

18

Local Rule to be appropriate and in the interests of the parties and justice and sound case management

19

based upon the location of the parties. If any party prefers that the settlement conference is

20

conducted by a judicial officer not already assigned to this case, that party is directed to notify

21

the Court at least 60 days in advance of the scheduled settlement conference to allow sufficient

22

time for another judicial officer to be assigned to handle the conference.

23

Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the case shall

24

appear at the Settlement Conference with the parties and the person or persons having full authority

25

to negotiate and settle the case on terms2 discussed at the conference. Consideration of settlement is a

26
27
28

2
Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement agreements are
subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like shall be represented by a
person or persons who occupy high executive positions in the party organization and who will be directly involved in the
process of approval of any settlement offers or agreements. To the extent possible the representative shall have authority, if
he or she deems it appropriate, to settle the action on terms consistent with the opposing party's most recent demand.

6

1

serious matter that requires preparation prior to the settlement conference. Set forth below are the

2

procedures the Court will employ, absent good cause, in conducting the conference.

3

At least 21 days before the settlement conference, Plaintiff SHALL submit to Defendant via

4

fax or e-mail, a written itemization of damages and a meaningful3 settlement demand, which includes a

5

brief explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate. Thereafter, no later than 14 days before the

6

settlement conference, Defendant SHALL respond via fax or e-mail, with an acceptance of the offer or

7

with a meaningful counteroffer, including a brief explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate.

8
9
10

If settlement is not achieved, each party SHALL attach copies of their settlement offers to their
Confidential Settlement Conference Statement, as described below. Copies of these documents shall
not be filed on the court docket.
CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT

11
12

At least five court days before the Settlement Conference, the parties shall submit, directly to

13

Judge Thurston's chambers by e-mail to [e-mail], a Confidential Settlement

14

Conference Statement. The statement should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on

15

any other party, although the parties may file a Notice of Lodging of Settlement Conference

16

Statement. Each statement shall be clearly marked "confidential" with the date and time of the

17

Settlement Conference indicated prominently thereon.

18

The Confidential Settlement Conference Statement shall include the following:

19

A.

A brief statement of the facts of the case.

20

B.

A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon which

21

the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties' likelihood of prevailing on

22

the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in dispute.

23

C.

A summary of the proceedings to date.

24

D.

An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial and trial.

25

E.

The relief sought.

26

F.

The party's position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a history of

27
28

3

“Meaningful” means that the offer is reasonably calculated to settle the case on terms acceptable to the offering
party. “Meaningful” does not include an offer which the offering party knows will not be acceptable to the other party.

7

past settlement discussions, offers and demands.

1
2

XII.

Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other

3

Techniques to Shorten Trial

4

Not applicable at this time.

5

XIII. Related Matters Pending
The following pending matters have been related: (1) Darlene Garcia v. FCA US, LLC, Case

6
7

No. 1:16-cv-00730-DAD-JLT; (2) Larry Powell v. FCA US, LLC, Case No. 2:16-cv-02781-DAD-JLT;

8

(3) Robert Heffington v. FCA US, LLC, Case No. 2:17-cv-00317-DAD-JLT; (4) Timothy Durham v.

9

FCA US, LLC, Case No. 2:17-cv-00596-DAD-JLT; (5) Larry Celestine v. FCA US, LLC, Case No.

10

2:17-cv-00597-DAD-JLT; (6) Julian (III) Flores et al. v. FCA US, LCC, Case No. 1:17-cv-00427-

11

DAD-JLT; and (7) Carla Sekula v. FCA US, LLC, et al., Case No. 1:17-cv-00460-DAD-JLT. (Doc. 5)

12

XIV. Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

13
14

and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any

15

amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to efficiently

16

handle its increasing case load and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow both the Federal

17

Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of California.

18

XV.

19

Effect of this Order
The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most

20

suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the

21

parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered

22

to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by

23

subsequent status conference.

24

The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a

25

showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations

26

extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by

27

affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause

28

for granting the relief requested.
8

1

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.

2
3
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

May 17, 2017

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9