Vivanco v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, et al.
Filing
42
STIPULATION and ORDER to (1) Extend Time for Defendants to File a Reply in Support of their Motion for Summary Judgment and (2) Reschedule the Hearing on the Motion, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/17/2019. Pursuant to the partie s' stipulation, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall file their reply in support of their motion for summary judgment by April 26, 2019. The hearing on Defendants' motion for summary judgment currently set for April 26, 2019, is HEREBY CONTINUED to June 7, 2019, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. (Valdez, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
XAVIER BECERRA, State Bar No. 118517
Attorney General of California
NEAH HUYNH, State Bar No. 235377
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
PREETI K. BAJWA, State Bar No. 232484
Deputy Attorney General
JENYA M. PARKMAN, State Bar No. 310302
Deputy Attorney General
1515 Clay St. 20th Floor
Oakland, CA 94102
Telephone: (510) 879-0980
Fax: (415) 703-5843
E-mail: Preeti.Bajwa@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Defendants
California Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation and S. Frauenheim
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
FRESNO DIVISION
12
13
14
15
MARISOL VIVANCO, individually and as
Successor in Interest of SOLTON
VIVANCO GONZALEZ (deceased),
16
17
v.
1:17-cv-00434 LJO BAM
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO (1)
EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO
Plaintiff, FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND (2) RESCHEDULE THE HEARING
ON THE MOTION
18
19
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS & REHABILITATION, et
al.,
Judge:
The Honorable Barbara A.
McAuliffe
Action Filed: December 20, 2016
20
Defendants.
21
22
Defendants California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Warden S.
23
Frauenheim, and Plaintiff Marisol Vivanco, stipulate that the Court extend the time for
24
Defendants to file a reply in support of their summary judgment motion by April 26, 2019, and
25
reschedule the hearing date on the motion from April 26, 2019 at 9 a.m. to June 7, 2019 at 9 a.m.
26
As explained in the accompanying declaration and required by Civil Local Rule 144, there
27
is good cause for granting an extension because Defendants require additional time to address
28
1
Stipulation and Order to Extend Dispositive Motion Deadline (1:17-cv-00434 LJO BAM)
1
Plaintiff’s opposition to facts which the parties had previously stipulated. (Decl. of Preeti K.
2
Bajwa ¶ 4.)
3
This is the parties’ first request for an extension of time to file a reply in support of their
4
motion for summary judgment.
5
Dated: April 16, 2019
XAVIER BECERRA
Attorney General of California
NEAH HUYNH
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
6
7
8
9
/s/ Preeti K. Bajwa
PREETI K. BAJWA
JENYA M. PARKMAN
Deputy Attorneys General
Attorneys for Defendants
California Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation and S. Frauenheim
10
11
12
13
14
Dated: April 16, 2019
_/s/ Jesse Ortiz_______________________
JESSE ORTIZ
NOLAN BERGGREN
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Marisol Vivanco
15
16
17
18
SA2017303802
42106766.docx
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Stipulation and Order to Extend Dispositive Motion Deadline (1:17-cv-00434 LJO BAM)
1
ORDER
2
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
3
that Defendants shall file their reply in support of their motion for summary judgment by April 26,
4
2019. The hearing on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment currently set for April 26, 2019,
5
is HEREBY CONTINUED to June 7, 2019, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before
6
Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe.
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
April 17, 2019
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Stipulation and Order to Extend Dispositive Motion Deadline (1:17-cv-00434 LJO BAM)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?