Quiroz v. City of Ceres
Filing
63
ORDER Granting 62 Stipulation Regarding Tolling Statute of Limitations, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/20/2018. (1. The parties' stipulation regarding tolling the statute of limitations for individuals listed on Attachment B (Doc. No. 62) is granted; 2. The parties are ordered to prepare and distribute the class notice to the potential plaintiffs in a manner consistent with the parties' stipulation.)(Gaumnitz, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
CARLOS A. QUIROZ, on behalf of
himself and all similarly situated
individuals,
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF CERES,
16
No. 1:17-cv-00444-DAD-BAM
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
REGARDING TOLLING STATUTE OF
LIMITATIONS
(Doc. No. 62.)
Defendant.
17
18
The parties have submitted a stipulation regarding the tolling of the statute of limitations
19
for ten individuals as identified by the parties. (Doc. No. 62.) On June 22, 2017, the court issued
20
an order granting in part plaintiff’s first motion for conditional certification and facilitated notice.
21
(Doc. No. 29.) On October 20, 2017, the court issued an order granting in part plaintiff’s second
22
motion for conditional certification and facilitated class notice. (Doc. No. 48.) Since then, the
23
City of Ceres (“City”) has noticed individuals in both conditionally certified classes. (See Doc.
24
No. 62 at 2.)
25
On April 19, 2018, the parties submitted a stipulation indicating the following. In
26
reviewing this matter, the City determined that there were ten individuals who should have been
27
noticed as part of the initially conditionally certified class but may not have been issued notice.
28
(Id. at 2, ¶ 8–9.) These individuals have not opted in to this action and are not represented in the
1
1
actions related to this case, which include: Jonathan McManus et al. v. City of Ceres, Case No.
2
1:17-cv-00355-DAD-MJS; Julio Amador et al. v. City of Ceres, Case No. 1:17-cv-00552,
3
Miranda et al. v. City of Ceres, Case No.: 1:18-cv-00041-DAD-BAM. Having reviewed the
4
stipulation, the court finds the parties’ proposal to toll the statute of limitations to be appropriate.
5
Accordingly,
6
1. The parties’ stipulation regarding tolling the statute of limitations for individuals listed
7
8
on Attachment B (Doc. No. 62) is granted;
2. The parties are ordered to prepare and distribute the class notice to the potential
plaintiffs in a manner consistent with the parties’ stipulation.
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
April 20, 2018
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?