Turner v. State of California et al
Filing
2
ORDER Transferring Case to Northern District of California signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 04/13/2017. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
EDWARD TURNER,
Case No. 1:17-cv-00454-GSA-PC
Plaintiff,
12
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
v.
13
14
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
I.
BACKGROUND
18
Edward Turner (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights
19
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on
20
March 30, 2017. (ECF No. 1.)
21
II.
VENUE
22
The federal venue statute requires that a civil action, other than one based on diversity
23
jurisdiction, be brought only in “(1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all
24
defendants reside in the same state; (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the
25
events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of the property that is
26
the subject of the action is situated; or (3) if there is no district in which an action may
27
otherwise be brought as provided in this section, any judicial district in which any defendant is
28
subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction with respect to such action.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).
1
1
In this case, none of the defendants named in the Complaint reside in this district. The
2
claims arose in Richmond, California, located in Contra Costa County, which is in the Northern
3
District of California. Therefore, Plaintiff=s claims are properly brought in the United States
4
District Court for the Northern District of California. In the interest of justice, a federal court
5
may transfer a complaint filed in the wrong district to the correct district. See 28 U.S.C. '
6
1406(a); Starnes v. McGuire, 512 F.2d 918, 932 (D.C. Cir. 1974).
7
III.
8
9
CONCLUSION
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United
States District Court for the Northern District of California.
10
11
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
April 13, 2017
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?