Bryant v. Supercuts Corporate Shops, Inc. et al

Filing 10

ORDER GRANTING the parties Joint Application for an Extension of Time to June 7, 2017, for defendant Supercuts to file a responsive pleading. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 5/24/2017. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Catherine M. Dacre (SBN 141988) cdacre@seyfarth.com Eden Anderson (SBN 233464) eanderson@seyfarth.com 560 Mission Street, 31st Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 397-2823 Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C. Zachary M. Best (SBN 166035) service@mission.legal 332 North Second Street San Jose, California 95112 Telephone: (408) 298-2000 Facsimile: (408) 298-6046 Attorneys for Plaintiff RACHEL BRYANT Attorneys for Defendant SUPERCUTS CORPORATE SHOPS, INC. dba SUPERCUTS #9759 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 RACHEL BRYANT, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 v. SUPERCUTS CORPORATE SHOPS, INC. dba SUPERCUTS #9759; TUNG THANH NGUYEN, Trustee of THE TUNG THANH NGUYEN AND LIEN THI DUONG 2006 TRUST; LIEN THI DUONG, Trustee of THE TUNG THANH NGUYEN AND LIEN THI DUONG 2006 TRUST; Defendants. Case No. 1:17-cv-00458 LJO-EPG JOINT APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT SUPERCUTS CORPORATE SHOPS, INC. DBA SUPERCUTS #9759 TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT ASSERTING DENIAL OF RIGHT OF ACCESS UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, DAMAGES, ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS (ADA); ORDER THEREON Complaint Served: 4/5/17 Current Response Date: 5/24/17 New Response Date: 6/7/17 Trial Date: None Set District Judge: Hon. Lawrence J. O’Neill 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON; CASE NO. 1:17-cv-00458-LJO-EPG 1 Defendant SUPERCUTS CORPORATE SHOPS, INC. dba SUPERCUTS #9759 2 (“Supercuts”) and Plaintiff Rachel Bryant (“Plaintiff”) hereby joint apply for an extension of 3 Supercuts’ responsive pleading deadline. In support of this application, the parties state the 4 following: 5 WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s Complaint was filed on March 30, 2017; 6 WHEREAS, Supercuts was served on April 5, 2017 and, after having obtained an initial 28- 7 day extension through stipulation, its responsive pleading deadline is May 24, 2017; 8 WHEREAS, Supercuts and Plaintiff are in the process of finalizing a settlement agreement 9 and Supercuts would like to avoid the cost of having to prepare a responsive pleading. The parties 10 11 anticipate the settlement agreement can be finalized within the next two weeks. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and through the undersigned parties 12 that Supercuts may have an additional two-week extension of time to respond to the Complaint to and 13 including June 7, 2017. The parties hereby jointly submit this application and jointly request that it 14 be granted for good cause as shown above. 15 16 DATED: May 23, 2017 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 17 By: /s/ Eden Anderson Eden Anderson 18 19 Attorneys for Defendant SUPERCUTS CORPORATE SHOPS, INC. dba SUPERCUTS #9759 20 21 22 DATED: May 23, 2017 MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C. 23 24 25 26 By: /s/ Zachary M. Best Zachary M. Best Attorneys for Plaintiff RACHEL BRYANT 27 28 2 JOINT APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON; CASE NO. 1:17-cv-00458-LJO-EPG 1 2 3 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION I hereby attest that all signatories listed above, on whose behalf this stipulation is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing. 4 5 Dated: May 23, 2017 6 7 By: /s/ Eden Anderson Eden Anderson Attorneys for Defendant SUPERCUTS CORPORATE SHOPS, INC. dba SUPERCUTS #9759 8 9 ORDER 10 11 12 The Parties’ Joint Application for Extension of Time is hereby GRANTED. Supercuts shall have until June 7, 2017 to file its responsive pleading. 13 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 24, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 JOINT APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON; CASE NO. 1:17-cv-00458-LJO-EPG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?