Bryant v. Supercuts Corporate Shops, Inc. et al

Filing 16

ORDER Directing the Clerk of the Court to Terminate Defendant Supercut Corporate Shops, Inc. 15 , signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 6/27/17: Supercuts Corporate Shops, Inc. TERMINATED as a Defendant in this case. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RACHEL BRYANT,

12

Plaintiff

13
14
15

v.
SUPERCUTS CORPORATE SHOPS,
INC., et al.,

Case No. 1:17-cv-00458-LJO-EPG
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF
THE COURT TO TERMINATE
DEFENDANT SUPERCUT CORPORATE
SHOPS, INC.
(ECF No. 15)

Defendants.

16
17

On June 26, 2017, Plaintiff Rachel Bryant filed a notice of voluntary dismissal dismissing
18
her claims against Defendant Supercuts, Inc. (sued as Supercuts Corporate Shops, Inc.) with
19
prejudice. (ECF No. 15.) No defendant has filed an answer or motion for summary judgment. In
20

light of Plaintiff’s notice, the claims against Defendant Supercuts Corporate Shops, Inc. have

21
been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692
22
(9th Cir. 1997), and dismissed with prejudice. Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir.
23
24

1995) (“Even if the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his action
voluntarily by filing a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1).”).

25
\\\
26
\\\
27
\\\
28
1

1
2

Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to terminate Supercuts Corporate
Shops, Inc. as a Defendant in this case.

3
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 27, 2017

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2