Bryant v. Supercuts Corporate Shops, Inc. et al

Filing 23

ORDER DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to Close the Case,signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/2/17. CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

RACHEL BRYANT,

10
11
12
13

Plaintiff

Case No. 1:17-cv-00458-LJO-EPG
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF
THE COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE

v.
(ECF No. 22)
SUPERCUTS CORPORATE SHOPS,
INC., et al.,
Defendants.

14
15

On September 26, 2017, Plaintiff Rachel Bryant filed a notice of dismissal dismissing his
16
case with prejudice. (ECF No. 22.) No defendant has filed an answer or motion for summary
17

judgment. In light of Plaintiff’s notice, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P.

18
41(a)(1)(A)(i); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been
19

dismissed with prejudice. Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“Even if the

20
defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his action voluntarily by filing
21

a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1).”).

22
Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case.
23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26

Dated:

October 2, 2017

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2