Anglen v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 29

ORDER DISCHARGING the Order to Show Cause issued on 10/14/2020, document 26 . The Court directs plaintiff, within seven days of the date of this order, to re-file the documents at issue (ECF Nos. [23-1] and [23-2]) in full compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(a) and Local Rule 140(a), redacting all but the last four digits of the social security number. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/16/2020. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ELIZABETH ANNE ANGLEN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 1:17-cv-00461-EPG v. ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. 16 In connection with his motion for attorney’s fees, Plaintiff’s counsel filed several 17 18 documents containing Plaintiff’s full Social-Security number. (ECF Nos. 23-1 & 23-2). When 19 granting his motion for attorney’s fees on September 30, 2020, the Court sealed those documents 20 and ordered Plaintiff to re-file them within seven days, with the redactions required by Federal 21 Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(a) and Local Rule 140(a), each of which require redacting all but the 22 last four digits of any Social-Security number in court filings. (ECF No. 25). 23 Plaintiff’s counsel had not filed such documents, so on October 14, 2020, the Court 24 ordered Plaintiff to show cause why he should not be sanctioned for his failure to do so. (ECF No. 25 26). 26 The same date, Plaintiff’s counsel responded to the order to show cause and stated he set a 27 reminder for the wrong date. (ECF No. 27). He also filed the documents again, this time redacting 28 Plaintiff’s full Social-Security number. (ECF No. 28). 1 1 2 3 In light of Plaintiff’s counsel’s explanation and the filing of the documents, the Court will discharge the order to show cause. However, Plaintiff’s filing still does not comply with the Federal and Local Rules. 4 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(a) and Local Rule 140(a) require redacting all but the last 5 four digits of the numbers. The Court also explained this requirement in its previous orders. 6 7 Accordingly, the Court will order Plaintiff’s counsel to re-file the two documents with proper redaction. 8 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 9 1. The Order to Show Cause (ECF No. 26) is HEREBY DISCHARGED; and 10 2. Within seven days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall re-file the documents at 11 issue (ECF Nos. 23-1 and 23-2) in full compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(a) 12 and Local Rule 140(a), redacting all but the last four digits of the social security number. 13 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 16, 2020 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?