Anglen v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 32

Order for Plaintiff's counsel to show cause why Plaintiff's counsel should not be sanctioned for failing to comply with court order, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 11/18/2020 Show Cause Response due by 12/9/2020. (Rosales, O.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ELIZABETH ANNE ANGLEN,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

v.
ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social
Security,

No. 1:17-cv-00461-EPG
ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFF’S
COUNSEL SHOULD NOT BE SANCTIONED
FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH COURT
ORDER
TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

Defendant.

16
17

On October 27, 2020, the Court ordered that “[w]ithin twenty-one (21) days from the date

18

of this Order, Plaintiff’s counsel shall provide the Court with an updated address for Plaintiff” so

19

that the clerk of court could mail a copy of the order awarding attorney’s fees to Plaintiff’s

20

counsel to Plaintiff. (ECF No. 31 at 2). More than twenty-one days have passed, and Plaintiff’s

21

counsel, Cyrus Safa (“Safa”), did not file an updated address for Plaintiff.
This is the second recent order for Safa to show cause in this case. (See ECF Nos 26, 27,

22
23

29) (order to show cause, response, and order discharging order to show cause).

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days from the date of

2

this Order, Safa shall show cause why Safa should not be sanctioned for failing to comply with

3

the Court’s October 27, 2020 Order.

4
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

November 18, 2020

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2