Kim Adams v. County of Kern et al

Filing 38

STIPULATION and ORDER 37 to Modify Scheduling Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/24/2019. Discovery Deadlines: Non-Expert 9/3/2019; Expert 10/21/2019. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 11/4/2019; Hearing by 12/16/2019. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 James D. Weakley, Esq. Brande L. Gustafson, Esq. Bar No. 082853 Bar No. 267130 5 Weakley & Arendt A Professional Corporation 1630 East Shaw Ave., Suite 176 Fresno, California 93710 Telephone: (559) 221-5256 Facsimile: (559) 221-5262 6 Jim@walaw-fresno.com Brande@walaw-fresno.com 7 Attorneys for Defendant, Reyes Soberon, Jr. 3 4 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 KIM ADAMS, an individual, Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 17 COUNTY OF KERN; KERN COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT; DAVID M. KUGE, an individual; REYES SOBERON, JR., and individual; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 18 Defendants. 15 16 19 20 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:17-cv-00464-JLT STIPULATION AND [Proposed] ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER (Doc. 464) The parties, by and through their respective counsel, have stipulated to modify the discovery deadlines and existing Scheduling Order (Doc. No. 36) as follows: 21 22 Event/Deadline 23 Non-Expert Discovery 24 Stipulated New Date Deadline 25 Existing Date July 3, 2019 September 3, 2019 Expert Witness Disclosure July 17, 2019 September 10, 2019 26 Rebuttal Witness Disclosure August 14, 2019 October 1, 2019 27 Expert Discovery Deadline September 9, 2019 October 21, 2019 28 Stipulation & [Proposed] Order to Modify Scheduling Order 1 1 4 November 4, 2019 October 21, 2019 December 16, 2019 November 4, 2019 No Change December 16, 2019 No Change February 3, 2020 No Change Trial 3 September 23, 2019 Pre-Trial Conference 2 Non-Dispositive Motion March 30, 2020 No Change Deadline (Filing) Non-Dispositive Motion Deadline (Hearing) 5 Dispositive Motion Deadline 6 (Filing) 7 Dispositive Motion Deadline 8 (Hearing) 9 10 11 12 The parties request an order modifying scheduling order. The parties have been 13 cooperating in scheduling depositions in an effort to conclude non-expert discovery within the 14 time frame set out in the current scheduling order. However, Plaintiff’s children and caretaker 15 are either out of town due to an ill family member or have their own medical appointments that 16 prevent them from being available for a deposition prior to the current deadline to complete 17 non-expert discovery. Additionally, counsel for defendants County of Kern and David M. Kuge 18 is scheduled for knee surgery on June 26, 2019 and will be unavailable during the following 19 three to four weeks while recovering from the surgery and there is no one else in the office with 20 knowledge of this case that would be able to step in and take the remaining depositions. 21 The parties believe these there is good cause for the above proposed changes to the 22 discovery deadlines, which would allow the parties to keep the currently scheduled trial date. 23 Respectfully Submitted, 24 DATED: June 20, 2019 25 26 WEAKLEY & ARENDT A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION /s/ Brande L. Gustafson James D. Weakley Brande L. Gustafson Attorneys for Defendant, Reyes Soberon, Jr. 27 28 Stipulation & [Proposed] Order to Modify Scheduling Order 2 1 DATED: June 21, 2019 MARGO A. RAISON, KERN COUNTY COUNSEL 2 3 /s/ Marshall S. Fontes (As authorized on 6/21/19) Marshall S. Fontes, Deputy County Counsel Attorneys for Defendants County of Kern, Kern County Probation Department, and David M. Kuge 4 5 6 DATED: June 20, 2019 7 GERAGOS & GERAGOS /s/ Noah Geldberg (As authorized on 6/20/19) Mark J. Geragos Ben J. Meiselas Noah Geldberg Attorneys for Plaintiff Kim Adams 8 9 10 ORDER 11 12 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 24, 2019 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation & [Proposed] Order to Modify Scheduling Order 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?