Hernandez v. Ballam, et al.
Filing
66
ORDER Regarding Defendants' Status Report; ORDER Requiring Second Status Report by Defendants Within Ninety (90) Days 64 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/9/2018. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
ANTHONY CEASAR HERNANDEZ,
Case No.: 1:17-cv-00468-LJO-BAM (PC)
9
Plaintiff,
ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’
STATUS REPORT
10
v.
11
BALLAM, et al.,
Defendants.
12
ORDER REQUIRING SECOND STATUS
REPORT BY DEFENDANTS WITHIN
NINETY (90) DAYS
[Doc No. 64]
13
14
Plaintiff Anthony Ceasar Hernandez is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
15
16 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case proceeds on
17 Plaintiff’s second amended complaint alleging excessive force in violation of the Eighth
18 Amendment against Defendants Perez and Duran, and for the failure to intervene in the use of
19 excessive force against Defendant Ballam.
On July 9, 2018, the Court stayed this matter pending the resolution of Plaintiff’s ongoing
20
21 criminal case that concerns the same events at issue in this case. (Doc. No. 56.) The Court
22 further ordered Defendants to file a status report, within ninety (90) days of that order, setting
23 forth the status of Plaintiff’s criminal case. (Id. at 6.)
On October 8, 2018, Defendants timely submitted a status report. (Doc. No. 64.)1 The
24
25 status report reflects that a trial setting hearing was held on September 21, 2018 in Plaintiff’s
26
27
1
October 8, 2018 was a federal legal holiday, and therefore the Court was closed, which extended the
deadline for Defendants’ compliance with the Court’s order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(1)(C).
28 Nevertheless, the Court’s CM/ECF electronic filing system accepted filings on October 8, 2018.
1 criminal case, People v. Hernandez, Madera County Superior Court Case No. MCR055598. (Id.
2 at 4.) A trial date was set for December 11, 2018 at that hearing, with pretrial and final pretrial
3 confirmation dates of October 19, 2018 and December 7, 2018, respectively. (Id.)
4
Accordingly, the Court finds it is not yet appropriate to lift the stay in this matter.
5 Defendants are HEREBY ORDERED to file a second status report within ninety (90) days of
6 the date of this order, updating the Court as to the status of Plaintiff’s criminal case, if it is not
7 resolved by the end of that period.
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
October 9, 2018
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?