Hall et al v. Nakahara et al

Filing 4

ORDER ADOPTING 3 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL; ORDER DENYING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; and ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to Pay the Filing Fee in This Action Within Forty-Five (45) Days signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 5/12/2017. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JASON LAMAR HALL,

14

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND REQUIRING
PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE FILING FEE IN
THIS ACTION

Plaintiff,

12
13

Case No. 1:17-cv-00481-LJO-SAB

v.
VERNON NAKAHARA, et al.,

(ECF Nos. 2, 3)

Defendants.

15

FORTY-FIVE DAY DEADLINE

16
17

Plaintiff Jason Lamar Hall is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42

18 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28
19 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20

On April 6, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations.

The

21 findings and recommendations recommended denying Plaintiff’s application to proceed without
22 prepayment of fees. The findings and recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained
23 notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30)
24 days from the date of service. The period for filing objections has passed and no objections have
25 been filed.
26

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

27 a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the
28 findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

FULL;

3
4

2.

3.

Plaintiff shall pay the filing fee of $400.00 within forty-five days from the date of
service of this order; and

7
8

Plaintiff’s applications to proceed without prepayment of fees in this action are
DENIED;

5
6

The findings and recommendations, filed April 6, 2017, are ADOPTED IN

4.

If Plaintiff fails to pay the filing fee in compliance with this order, this action shall
be dismissed.

9
10
11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____

May 12, 2017

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2